Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Car\s+Classification\s+in\s+DSP\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Car\s+Classification\s+in\s+DSP\s+Question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Toy4speed@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:51:39 EST; Hey All: Just wondering what is the procedure to review another driver's car class ? Possible posting error or sometimes an individual's own misunderstanding of his/her car class ? I noticed the Mits; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00555.html (7,496 bytes)
2. RE: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:09:45 -0800; 3000GT Turbo is an ASP car. Now, tell my how Bill Davis and I got a 3000ZX on Saturday =P. -Carl; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00558.html (8,298 bytes)
3. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:03:46 -0800; The rules say it is the responsibility of the driver to correctly classify his/her car. If the results were posted at an event (hmmm-hmmm-de-dum) problems like this can be taken care of at an event.; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00559.html (8,060 bytes)
4. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:24:32 -0800; Actually, it's not. It runs in BSP, just like most of the large, Japanese turbo cars. http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/sp_carsc.txt BSP Mitsubishi 3000GT Turbo Feb-2000 -Kit -- ** Kit Wetzler http://w; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00561.html (8,904 bytes)
5. RE: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:28:36 -0800; I just double checked my 2000 rule book, and it's actually listed in BOTH: ASP "3000GT Turbo" ASP "3000GT non-turbo" BSP "3000GT Turbo" I guess it sucks to drive a non-turbo 3000GT eh? -Carl; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00562.html (9,856 bytes)
6. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:51:46 PST; There is a provision in the region supps for just this eventuality. I don't have them in front of me, but I believe you need to file a protest with Charlie Davis. Check the supps on the web site. KeS; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00568.html (8,200 bytes)
7. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:53:09 -0800; According to rule 14 of the SFR supplemental rules (www.sfrscca.org/solo2/supps.html): 14. Protest chief may entertain late protests based only upon improper model classification. Such protests may b; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00569.html (8,458 bytes)
8. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:53:30 -0800; ive ridden in that car, and i believe the owner said it was stock. not sure why it ended up in DSP. :( now THATS a car for which 3COM is as flat and smooth as glass. ohmigod it launches hard too. -Ja; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00589.html (8,766 bytes)
9. Re: Car Classification in DSP Question (score: 1): Author: Toy4speed@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:29:39 EST; Hello Soebie: I don't desire to file a formal protest regarding the mis-classification of the 300+ hp AWD Turbo 3000GTVR4 into DSP. Really, I just hope that the driver is informed on how to register; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00616.html (7,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]