Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1999\s+Solo\s+2\s+Nationals\s+South\s+Course\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1999\s+Solo\s+2\s+Nationals\s+South\s+Course\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: 1999 Solo 2 Nationals South Course (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:46:02 -0800; Agreed...folks were putting the 99 south course which I vaguely --Pat K; /html/ba-autox/2001-03/msg00491.html (7,852 bytes)
22. RE: 1999 Solo 2 Nationals South Course (score: 1): Author: Chris Warner <jabrwoky@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:12:13 -0800; A two lap run might just get me out to Stockton again. I personally hate the place. Too small, too much opportunity let the loose stuff walk away. I'll take GG fields anyday over stockton. --Original; /html/ba-autox/2001-03/msg00492.html (9,655 bytes)
23. Re: 1999 Solo 2 Nationals South Course (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:31:15 EST; That might be my mistake... I thought we were talking '00 all along. I had to look at my archive for the '99 course. It wouldn't work either, IMHO. Stockton is just too small to scale anything down f; /html/ba-autox/2001-03/msg00494.html (7,759 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]