Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*non\-stock\s+M3\s+LTW\.\.\.\?\s+Type\s+R\,\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*non\-stock\s+M3\s+LTW\.\.\.\?\s+Type\s+R\,\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: non-stock M3 LTW...? Type R, again (score: 1): Author: rohns@doitnow.com (Jim & Marilyn Rohn); Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:59:39 -0700 (MST); ...but it easily compares to the Type R .... Jim Rohn loves to see a good thread war; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01133.html (9,563 bytes)
2. Re: non-stock M3 LTW...? Type R, again (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:51:30 -0000; To which Jim Rohn replied: Come now Jim, there were at least 200 Type R's built! All kidding aside, whereas both the M3 Lightweight and the Neon ACR were built for racing purposes, the Type R importe; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01154.html (8,155 bytes)
3. Re: non-stock M3 LTW...? Type R, again (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:14:40 -0400 (EDT); Yeah it does. Good thing the Type R isn't already classed as a stock car... ...oh wait it is. Do you have a point somewhere in there? Mark; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01155.html (6,978 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]