- 21. RE: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Zahornasky" <p.zahornasky@att.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:31:00 -0500
- Just get the open wheel car. Life is some much more satisfing. Imagine thinking "Hmm, the car has a slight push" and being able to adjust it between runs. I think Tommy Saunders still has his Nationa
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00087.html (10,502 bytes)
- 22. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:26:57 -0800
- But then an out-of-control A-wing would crash into the cruiser's bridge and it would be OVAH!! Scot -- Original Message -- From: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com> To: "'Scot Zediker'" <roadsterbo
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00089.html (10,038 bytes)
- 23. RE: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:33:45 -0600
- But then an out-of-control A-wing would crash into the cruiser's bridge and it would be OVAH!! Okay then a Death Star with a well defended external venting system. Maybe K&N? Maybe we need to get a
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00090.html (9,180 bytes)
- 24. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:46:10 -0500 (EST)
- Why not just run in SM2? Then there's no question at all of legality. ASP cars have proven to be competitive in SM2 right now and will likely remain so for a few years... Mark /// unsubscribe/change
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00092.html (9,197 bytes)
- 25. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:20:17 -0800 (PST)
- suppose i might as well. Need to see what the local SFRSCCA is like though in terms of classes - i'd prefer not to win SM2 every time because i'm the only car running in it, ie, if nobody else is run
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00097.html (9,765 bytes)
- 26. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:31:44 -0600
- I'd rather work on my driving than my car any day!! Good luck this year! Patrick Washburn C-Tech Trailer Cabinets Designed for the Racer Wausau, WI www.racecabinet.com 715-355-8842 /// unsubscribe/c
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00098.html (8,740 bytes)
- 27. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: ThoughtBoxLabs@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:55:12 -0500
- Umm, putting an aftermarket exhaust on the car would keep you smog legal (maybe), but it would still disqualify you from stock. Computer too. I remember hearing about completely cosmetic changes that
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00113.html (8,664 bytes)
- 28. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:18:27 -0800
- On Friday, Jan 10, 2003, at 21:55 US/Pacific, ThoughtBoxLabs@aol.com Open hand, insert rule book. Exhaust behind the cat is permitted in all classes from Stock onward (SCCA rules). KeS /// unsubscrib
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00114.html (8,811 bytes)
- 29. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Davis" <brian.davis@rose-hulman.edu>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:26:58 -0500
- (maybe), but it would still disqualify you from stock. Computer too. I remember hearing about completely cosmetic changes that disqualified Neon owners from stock class, I guess that sort of thing i
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00115.html (8,627 bytes)
- 30. Re: need clarification on a rule, please... (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:28:26 -0800 (PST)
- yeah, i'm planning on running SM2 this year, I think. If i decide to be competitive, i'll have the car built to SM2 or ASP spec... or buy a different car to race, maybe a Mod car or a 240Z or a 1st g
- /html/autox/2003-01/msg00142.html (8,666 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu