Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*minimum\s+weight\s+requirement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*minimum\s+weight\s+requirement\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:21:48 -0500; del It either Brian, The competitiveness of the del Sol has yet to be established in DSP. With that in mind there have been many IT cars run in SP, and in at least one case a competitor tried to expl; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00279.html (10,903 bytes)
22. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:31:17 -0700; Ok, it may be in poor taste, but that's never stopped me before. Doesn't this philosophy heavily (har!) favor people with prosthetic limbs? (yes, yes, I know) Cheers -b /// unsubscribe/change addres; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00280.html (9,605 bytes)
23. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:33:12 -0500; Already allowed 15.11.A allows prep of a Prepared car to the GTCS, 15.11.B allows prep of a Prepared car to the PCS. They do have to be cars specified in the GTCS or PCS, but those 15.11 rules also; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00281.html (9,511 bytes)
24. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:14:09 -0500; very drive Few remember that once upon a time -- for one year only (1982) -- we DID weigh with driver. This came in shortly after road racing went to weighing with driver. We discovered a key differe; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00282.html (10,151 bytes)
25. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:46:10 -0500; << Man, if that'd been me, I'd have been down to my skivvies and barefoot, arguing everything else was stuff that was in the car when it ran. Visual journey I don't want to take. /// unsubscribe/chan; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00283.html (9,074 bytes)
26. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:59:18 -0700; No, I don't think you can argue that, because then you'd get nailed on illegal wheel/pedal mods. KeS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00284.html (9,924 bytes)
27. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:02:19 -0700; Well, it would have facilitated the course cleanup, at leat. ;) Serious question - what were the circumstances of the roll? I've thought rolling to be almost exlusively a stock sedan - borderline SP; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00285.html (9,857 bytes)
28. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:27:24 -0500; Serious question - what were the circumstances of the roll? I've thought rolling to be almost exlusively a stock sedan - borderline SP problem. Well at least three diferent EM cars were on two wheel; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00287.html (9,099 bytes)
29. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:30:40 -0500; LOL. The advantages of being chronically overweight (the car! Not me, but I am too). --Rocky /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00288.html (9,484 bytes)
30. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:45:52 -0500; I think Rocky (and Rick Brown) both nailed my biggest concern about this proposal. Even though I stated in my original response that it would affect drivers like ME because we're skinny little fartz,; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00292.html (10,519 bytes)
31. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Brian Davis" <brian.davis@rose-hulman.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:46:31 -0500; Point taken. The minimum weight I could get to on my budget ;o) And I'm honestly not sure there's more than about 25 lbs or so on any budget. One problem with the del Sol for weight reduction in SP i; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00293.html (11,379 bytes)
32. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:00:23 -0500; If you're going to do that, then I would suggest that you also change the rules for Stock and Street Prepared (as well as Street Touring, Street Modified, and ALL Modified classes) and require THEM t; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00296.html (10,449 bytes)
33. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:20:25 -0500; I put my DP Mini up on two wheels - at a 45-degree angle to the pavement - at the Dallas Divisional this year. Fortunately, I saved it. Turned out to be a failed right front shock, but that's neither; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00297.html (9,415 bytes)
34. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:37:59 -0400; There's a theory that the less 'important' the situation, the nastier the politics/infighting/whatever. I've always heard it as an explanation for why the infighting was so nasty in academia, but I s; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00298.html (9,212 bytes)
35. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:39:43 -0500; Check CM. Patrick Washburn C-Tech Trailer Cabinets Designed for the Racer Wausau, WI www.racecabinet.com 715-355-8842 /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// ht; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00301.html (9,203 bytes)
36. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <pullg@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:21:59 -0400; of 4 leveled No point for Stock, ST and SP...there are no minimum (or maximum) weight limits, with or without the driver. Jamie '92 Prelude Si Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jsculerati; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00302.html (9,721 bytes)
37. Fw: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:51:54 -0700; 4 leveled rules for Stock and Street Prepared (as well as Street Touring, Street Modified, and ALL Modified classes) and require THEM to weigh with driver as well! Weight makes a difference in ANY cl; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00303.html (13,158 bytes)
38. Fw: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:53:21 -0700; -- Original Message -- From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net> To: "Dave Hardy" <dave2020@mindspring.com>; "John Lieberman" <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net> Cc: "'Aaron Jo; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00304.html (11,396 bytes)
39. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:18:40 -0500; I really don't want to further this discussion too much, but...your certainly couldn't be the reason for the change, is it? Again this kind of problem is easily solved if the events and rule book are; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00306.html (12,922 bytes)
40. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:41:54 -0700; MessageHow ballast is secured is a safety item. If this situation where someone put kitty litter unsecured into a car for ballast was done, something is definitely wrong with how cars are inspected..; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00309.html (10,032 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]