Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*minimum\s+weight\s+requirement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*minimum\s+weight\s+requirement\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:49:05 -0700; I've read the Solo rule book cover to cover and can't find the rule which states how minimum weight is taken, with or without driver, in the prepared category. The only mention of weights is that al; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00248.html (8,959 bytes)
2. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:54:31 -0500; I don't have a book handy, but we weighed Prepared classes without drivers at Nationals. Patrick Washburn C-Tech Trailer Cabinets Designed for the Racer Wausau, WI www.racecabinet.com 715-355-8842 //; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00251.html (8,209 bytes)
3. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:40:38 -0500; The only mention of weights is that all minimum weights shall be easily attainable or something like that, which I find truly humourous. Easily obtainable. Those funny guys, they kill me. :) My Solo; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00252.html (8,334 bytes)
4. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:06:12 -0500; I meant to send the original reply back to the list, not to you I suspect that you'll save yourself some time and shoot an e-mail to hduncan@scca.org and ask what rule governs this tradition....I'd s; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00253.html (9,980 bytes)
5. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:10:51 -0500; Prepared cars are weighed without driver. There was an effort a few years ago to add 180 pounds to the minimum weights in the rulebook and weigh WITH driver, but it was defeated. (In my personal case; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00255.html (10,208 bytes)
6. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:44:12 -0700; Okay, so the consensus is that it is without driver. But I still maintain I will appeal any disqualification based on minimum weight that can be met with the driver in the car. I have sent my letter; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00256.html (9,178 bytes)
7. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:45:20 -0500; No, the _rule_ is that it is without driver. can be met That's fine, but you'll lose your appeal. car for autox You can already do that, but you have to meet the Solo II minimum weight. "Vehicle mini; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00260.html (9,545 bytes)
8. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:24:22 -0400 (EDT); Well, I'm sure the letter will be answered to confirm for you that the weight is without driver. One could make a pretty good argument that since it doesn't say one way or another that one should as; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00262.html (10,186 bytes)
9. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:32:05 -0400; As I recall, the Prepared rules refer to the GCR a lot. Have you checked there? David /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listin; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00263.html (8,644 bytes)
10. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:59:26 -0700; I understand the logic everyone is using. But by that same logic, nowhere in the rules does it say you can run driver adjustable sway bars in the prepared rules, however, many people do. What I do n; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00266.html (11,207 bytes)
11. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:14:37 -0700; First off, I'm not trying to find an advantage or screw the Solo people or be a dick about anything or whatever else people out there think...I'm just trying to clarify how a rule is interpreted. I'; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00268.html (11,228 bytes)
12. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:07:56 -0500; It's my position that no clarification is needed. nowhere >does it mention either "Car," "Automobile," or "Vehicle" minimum weight. Then you skipped 15.B, first paragraph, second sentence. It specifi; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00270.html (10,487 bytes)
13. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:11:45 -0700; But it doesn't say vehicle "without driver" as indicated elsewhere in the rule book (nor does it say with driver). Aaron is correct indicating there needs to be new language. If this has been argued; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00271.html (12,518 bytes)
14. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hardy" <dave2020@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:10:02 -0400; Why is weighing with driver a bad thing? In a class where the cars are very closely prepped and driven, the weight difference of the driver can make a difference. Do us big guys need to start recrui; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00272.html (9,558 bytes)
15. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 09:41:24 -0500; elsewhere in the Where do the Prepared rules _ever_ reference "with driver?" I haven't found such a reference. Only if you can somehow make yourself believe that the "driver" is inherently part of th; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00273.html (12,621 bytes)
16. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Brian Davis" <brian.davis@rose-hulman.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:58:00 -0500; Can you clarify this for me? I am currently building an ITS car (Honda del Sol) and was wanting to run it in DSP as well. Why will it be uncompetitive? It will be some lighter than I could ever get; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00274.html (9,931 bytes)
17. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:20:28 -0500; (Honda del Well, first you have the 7" rim width limitation in ITS, whereas most SP competitors in the smaller cars are running at least 8" rims (some FWD cars run 9s on the front and 8s on the rear); /html/autox/2002-10/msg00275.html (10,182 bytes)
18. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Brian Davis" <brian.davis@rose-hulman.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:50:36 -0500; True. I didn't mention this one, but realize it. Mentioned this one. Most of these mods only help much on the very high end anyway... Ahhh...I completely forgot this one!!! That can make a big diffe; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00276.html (10,713 bytes)
19. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:10:52 -0500; whereas 8" Don't underestimate the added grip that wider rims afford. Given the choice between wider _tires_ or wider_ wheels_, I'd almost always go with the latter. very high end I disagree. It's po; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00277.html (10,618 bytes)
20. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:25:18 -0500; The preamble of Section 15 (Prepared Category) specifies that "minimum weights shall be established," and the section where the cars in the classes are listed also mentions "Min. weight." By the fact; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00278.html (12,126 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]