Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*boxster\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*boxster\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. boxster? (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:00:39 -0700; Anyone know 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for a 2000 boxster? Thank you, Jason Isley jisley@cell1.com; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01463.html (6,410 bytes)
2. RE: boxster? (score: 1): Author: Paul Hagger <paulhag@microsoft.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:20:02 -0700; section, and look at the "Specs & Stats" tab of the Heraud Review. All 0-60/0.25mi times are relative, so make sure you compare to other numbers from the same source (whichever the source)... Trans:; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01464.html (7,061 bytes)
3. Re: boxster? (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 19:49:42 -0400; I believe those are old numbers. Here's from their site. Porsche typically underestimates there figures (FWIW) http://www.us.porsche.com/national/models/boxster/performance.htm Boxster Performance Ma; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01465.html (7,707 bytes)
4. Re: boxster? (score: 1): Author: Dennis S Pedersen <dennisp@rahul.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 12:01:02 -0700; That is definitely true. I used a G-Tech Pro to time my bone-stock '99 Boxster and got it down to 0-60 in 6.25 and 1/4 mile in 14.87 @ 94.1 mph, which is quite a bit better than the 6.7 and 15.1 tha; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01491.html (7,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]