Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Whats\s+better\:\s+camber\s+or\s+caster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Whats\s+better\:\s+camber\s+or\s+caster\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Whats better: camber or caster (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <brianberryhill@flashmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 15:30:43 -0600; I plan on slotting my front strut assembly mounting holes to get more negative camber and positive caster into my front suspension. But, I'd like to know what's the best combination for autox. Car: 9; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00044.html (7,625 bytes)
2. Re: Whats better: camber or caster (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <brianberryhill@flashmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 01:17:14 -0600; I've had two responses privately, hope the individuals don't mind me saying: 1. Camber is generally better for racing 2. Caster is better, because the more positive caster you have, the more negative; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00054.html (7,406 bytes)
3. Re: Whats better: camber or caster (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:32:53 EST; Camber-Okay on the street up to about 2 degrees, after that you'll get inside edge wear on the tires. Too much negative camber will also reduce footprint for straight line braking, but IMSA Radial Se; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00061.html (7,485 bytes)
4. Re: Whats better: camber or caster (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <brianberryhill@flashmail.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 07:22:13 -0600; Well, after taking my strut/spring combo out and noticing that I can't just grind out the 4 strut mounting bolts because the main strut mounting bolt has a round thing around it that limits how much; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00073.html (8,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]