Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Various\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Various\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Various (score: 1): Author: Jeff_Cashmore@firstar.com; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:30:27 -0600; Sorry to put these all in one post but my normal email system is down. Count me in as one (of the silent majority?) who likes the Tour scoring system the way it is. Regarding my class for next year,; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00380.html (7,545 bytes)
2. Re: Various (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 20:09:38 -0800 (PST); Mike McClure would probably beg to differ on that point. :) $90 ball joints, $150 tie rod ends, unobtainium bushings (you have to buy the whole FORGED aluminum control arm!)...parts ain't exactly che; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00425.html (6,555 bytes)
3. Various (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@execpc.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 09:56:25 -0500; "Could someone explain what exactly a Pro Solo course is?" See http://www.scca.org/amateur/prosolo2/index.html for more info "A 94+ Celica GT looks like a good bet but I'm not sure why the Celica see; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00977.html (9,188 bytes)
4. RE: Various (score: 1): Author: "Chris and Per Schroeder" <schroede@interaccess.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 18:26:40 -0500; Cashmo mentioned the article in NAP by "Lorenzo" in which he stated that all Celicas should be in G based merely on the results of Nats. I'd like to point out that in another part of that article, Lo; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00989.html (7,045 bytes)
5. Re: Various (score: 1): Author: Popsracr@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 20:19:09 EDT; Such reasoning for car classing is obviously from a miopic and naive point of view. I read that article too and he thinks ES is going to turn into the Celica class which would be far from reality. I; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00991.html (7,256 bytes)
6. Re: Various (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 19:11:58 -0700; How about some rebuttals in real print? Address to North American Pylon at this e-mail address. --Pat Kelly North American Pylon; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00993.html (7,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]