Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swaybars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swaybars\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Swaybars (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:18:04 -0400; <<<If you are not interested in exploring options to help grow/change the sport or you don't agree you have the option to delete the Did I write this? It sure sounds like I did... ;-) Seriously, the; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00804.html (7,738 bytes)
2. Re: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: Robert Glover <rob@f-body.org>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT); It's been done. It's called NASA. And while I'm not a member (yet), I can see where they're coming from. I may sound jaded or frustrated or what, but I seriously doubt that the SEB will make any rule; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00806.html (7,076 bytes)
3. RE: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:14:45 -0500; SEB will make any rule changes that don't suit them. It really doesn't matter what the people want; it's all a matter of what they feel like doing. Rob < And on what basis do you share this opinion?; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00811.html (7,471 bytes)
4. RE: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: Robert Glover <rob@f-body.org>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:59:48 -0700 (PDT); Yes, I was one of MANY lobbying for the allowance of subframe connectors. There are cars that NEED them. I can think of several third and fourth generation f-bodies and some Mustangs that have torn f; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00814.html (8,775 bytes)
5. re: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: David Hillman <hillman@enteract.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 16:10:32 -0500 (CDT); Paul Foster wrote... It would seem to me that the already-posted suggestion of grandfathering existing swaybar changes, and prohibiting all future cars from doing so would not be subject to either of; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00824.html (7,633 bytes)
6. RE: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:17:16 -0500; I know the feeling. There are lot of early Fiero owners who have added a rear bar which only partway brings them up to parity with the 88 suspension but are pushed into a higher class. However, the; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00835.html (7,532 bytes)
7. Re: Swaybars (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:35:04 -0400; I may have the year incorrect. Ex rivals Jim Martin and Franklin Wong had them. I thought the rear suspension was 'fixed' in 88.5 but it may have been '88. And yeah, GM dropped the model just after t; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00859.html (7,327 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]