Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Supplemental\s+classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Supplemental\s+classes\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:04:40 -0700 (PDT); Perhaps you'll remember that in 2001 the Camaro SS/Firebird WS6 was classed in SuperStock, but for 2002 got moved to BStock. In the original message I said that I started in SS (2001), got moved to B; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00016.html (8,768 bytes)
2. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:11:34 -0700 (PDT); Since I'm always right and never lie, I don't find it odd at all that you agree with me. ;) Yes, we're on the same page. The time sequence of your original post confused me, it sounded like you were; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00017.html (7,788 bytes)
3. Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:50:27 -0500; I was looking at the results of the "supplemental classes" (STX, SM2, F125) and thought just how ridiculous this "supplemental" concept is. So I just sent the following letter to the SEB. --Rocky Ent; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00296.html (11,115 bytes)
4. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:20:51 EDT; well, I guess I'll now have to send my counter-letter to the SEB (dang, one more letter to write). Should be no surprise, I have stated this in so many words previously: IMO a class should have to de; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00297.html (13,208 bytes)
5. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:15:08 -0500; Won't quibble, Mark, with your development argument. Basically I agree. To the point that if, given my scenario, the SEB decides to keep STX and SM2 as supplemental again next year, giving further ti; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00299.html (17,252 bytes)
6. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:33:23 -0400; when modification first, by You can't really believe that an undeveloped 20+ car class is less deserving than a single entrant class. There are plenty of National Champions in the latter category. B; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00301.html (8,609 bytes)
7. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:37:09 -0400; An honest question here: Is the "full championship salute" only a matter for Nationals, or for the sport as a whole? It's not normally enough (or it shouldn't be, anyway) for a class to make numbers; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00302.html (10,872 bytes)
8. RE: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:00:58 -0500; No offense to those who won their respective supplemental classes, but when the class is new, and especially if the vehicle development is modification heavy ($$$), it takes time for it mature to th; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00303.html (8,735 bytes)
9. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:46:27 -0500; "National Championship Class." Mark, you may well have the nut of the issue BTW, couldn't an argument be made that a "national" class is any class for which the SEB has codified a single set of prep; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00304.html (13,202 bytes)
10. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:15:28 EDT; I can assure you I don't take my quibbling with Rocket J. Squirrel lightly otherwise, I said what I felt compelled to say; no more, no less Mark T. Kirk - never quibble with a tribble /// unsubscribe; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00305.html (8,250 bytes)
11. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:21:55 EDT; ahhh, the power of exchanging ideas and debate ... Mark - method or madness? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Pa; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00307.html (8,531 bytes)
12. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:40:48 -0500; Indeed, Tiberius. Hearing your points, and Sirota's are all very helpful in the overall conceptualizing and refining the idea. thanks, --Rocket /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@a; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00308.html (8,567 bytes)
13. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:52:38 -0400; While I'm tempted to agree with you on the surface of this argument, there's another "real world" factor that intrudes: People will bottomfeed when a "National Championship" is on the line - when the; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00335.html (11,357 bytes)
14. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:02:26 -0400; Rocky said this and Dennis has repeated it, regarding the jacket. Prior to Nat's Jean posted that her investigation said there would be a jacket, but no name in the book. I don't know for sure what'; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00336.html (9,131 bytes)
15. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:12:36 -0400; title based to but There's a jacket, but it says "National Winner" not "National Champion" DG /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailm; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00337.html (9,034 bytes)
16. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:18:37 -0400; badly officially Two years. This is the first "official" Nationals for SM. In other words, we followed the process to the letter. DG /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.n; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00339.html (9,288 bytes)
17. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:43:56 -0400; I agree - but what you're missing here is that "level" is not just a measure of how many people show up at a single event, but rather, how many people show up _over a period of time_ Any class, give; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00354.html (15,866 bytes)
18. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "eric salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:58:13 -0500; We have far and away too many classes. To create new classes in the face of this means that the new classes MUST MUST MUST fulfill some powerfully lacking void in our coverage, and MUST MUST MUST ha; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00355.html (9,931 bytes)
19. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:14:04 -0500; That is not at all true. The process may not be _published_ anywhere, but But apparently not true. Until someone can offer an explaination as to why this has not been applied to F125, I am left with; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00358.html (9,692 bytes)
20. Re: Supplemental classes (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:48:55 EDT; and particularly when we're trying to promote young Jr. Kart membership to move up into the ranks. from the outside looking in, it sometimes seems like our system is based on chaos, rather than a gra; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00359.html (9,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]