Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM\s+no\s+superchargers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM\s+no\s+superchargers\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. SM no superchargers? (score: 1): Author: "Pylon.CC" <pylon@pylon.cc>; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 00:32:40 -0600; I have lightly been following this whole SM debate, but must have missed something somewhere.... Does SM not currently allow superchargers? or is it planned not to in the future? if I end up keeping; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00117.html (6,721 bytes)
2. RE: SM no superchargers? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:55:24 -0800; No forced induction over a certain displacement, I believe it's around 3 liters. KeS; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00119.html (7,407 bytes)
3. Re: SM no superchargers? (score: 1): Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 03:06:11 -0500; It's 3.0L for OHC engines and 4.0L for pushrod engines. Mike CP58 liters. is 8V, thought damn; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00120.html (7,103 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]