Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\&T\s+\#2\:\s+Sport\s+Sedans\s+$Was\:\s+328\s+vs\.\s+A4$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\&T\s+\#2\:\s+Sport\s+Sedans\s+$Was\:\s+328\s+vs\.\s+A4$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. R&T #2: Sport Sedans (Was: 328 vs. A4) (score: 1): Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:32:09 -0600; The Feb 99 issue of R&T rated 8 sport/lux sedans. Very interesting comparisons. First, on the 328 vs. A4 2.8 Quattro, the 328 was given a distinct nod in the overall preference numbers. However, the; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01109.html (7,909 bytes)
2. Re: R&T #2: Sport Sedans (Was: 328 vs. A4) (score: 1): Author: David K Yeung <dkyeung@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:54:36 -0600; you've hit the spot. these cars perform well in the standard tests and therefore look good on paper, but on an auto-x course, it's a very different story. In my experience (3500 lb FWD sedan), the ra; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01138.html (8,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]