Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pylon\s+for\s+October\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:54:44 -0500
North American Pylon's issue covering the 1999 SCCA Tire Rack Solo II Nationals went into the mail yesterday. As part of our coverage of every class, we print the complete results including results o
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00090.html (9,316 bytes)

2. RE: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "Colin Watson" <colinw@driverlabs.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:05:02 -0800
My understanding was that the SEB confirmed the RSR was classed in A Prepared. I see a big difference between a clarification and "adding". -Colin Watson
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00093.html (7,314 bytes)

3. Re: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 14:10:35 -0700
I think it was not so much the SEB confirming the RSR per se, but more of confirming that FIA GT prepared cars can compete in Prepared. Once that was decided, the RSR found itself in A/P. -Josh2 -- J
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00097.html (7,801 bytes)

4. Re: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 14:39:29 -0600
Yepper. Once the car was classed in GT1 for club racing (which happened earlier in the year) it was at that instant classed in AP. All the SEB did in that Sept. 2 letter was confirm the weight it had
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00100.html (8,637 bytes)

5. RE: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:20:38 -0500
Message text written by INTERNET:colinw@driverlabs.com " My understanding was that the SEB confirmed the RSR was classed in A Prepared. I see a big difference between a clarification and "adding". -C
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00108.html (8,621 bytes)

6. Re: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:20:45 -0500
Message text written by "Rocky Entriken" " Yepper. Once the car was classed in GT1 for club racing (which happened earlier in the year) it was at that instant classed in AP. All the SEB did in that S
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00109.html (9,368 bytes)

7. Re: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:26:07 -0500
Message text written by INTERNET:jhadler@rmi.net " I think it was not so much the SEB confirming the RSR per se, but more of confirming that FIA GT prepared cars can compete in Prepared. Once that wa
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00110.html (8,016 bytes)

8. Re: Pylon for October (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 09:32:25 -0500 (EST)
I don't have a dog in this fight and have no freaking clue if the RSR (or whatever it was) shoulda been classed in AP (or whereever it was), but the following I gotta respond to... Ok, maybe I've be
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00135.html (8,660 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu