Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Prepared\s+Cantillever\s+Tire\s+Rule\s+Vent\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:35:13 -0500
I just read the proposal in Fastrack and I am totally mystified. It appears that some people want to run competitively in Prepared with DOT tires. Is this the gist of it? If so I am terribly saddened
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00646.html (8,044 bytes)

2. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: GSMnow@aol.com
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:32:11 EST
In a message dated 2/25/01 8:44:17 AM Central Standard Time, "Paul Foster" <pfoster@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: << I just read the proposal in Fastrack and I am totally mystified. It appears that some pe
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00647.html (9,771 bytes)

3. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:59:01 -0500
<snip> With a few years of research, the wider rim package may become the faster setup, but only time will tell. If you are already running cantillevers, keep on running them. If you are setting up a
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00680.html (8,432 bytes)

4. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:51:41 -0500
Paul, FYI, I think you still missed the point. I think the DOT reference is for info only. The proposal is not suggesting that DOT tires replace slicks for Prepared. My understanding is that the curr
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00709.html (9,353 bytes)

5. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:59:06 -0500
Correction: "similar width but need wider RIMS will be . . . " Duh! Dick Rasmussen CM 85 85 Van Diemen RF-85 Formula Ford
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00710.html (7,867 bytes)

6. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:08:49 -0500
work people the Then I agree it sounds like they need to increase the wheel width to accomodate this. Do you know what is being done in Production to resolve this? Prepared. The way I read it is that
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00729.html (9,441 bytes)

7. RE: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Haden" <Bhaden@ucsd.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:41:16 -0800
Last I heard, the tire companies had actually said they had NO PLANS to stop making cantilevers. Anyone have RELIABLE info to the contrary? With all the road racing and autocross people out there usi
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00743.html (9,841 bytes)

8. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:41:46 -0800
I think the cantilevered tire "solution/proposal" was created so that car owners who have discovered the cantilever tire is faster want a replacement tire that can still have the same tire patch on t
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00744.html (11,155 bytes)

9. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:53:56 -0600
Just to throw a little more (mis)information in the pile here.. Some good friends of mine run a very competitive DP car, and if I understand correctly, the problem is that there was a switch in the c
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00747.html (11,088 bytes)

10. RE: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Haden" <Bhaden@ucsd.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:32:22 -0800
If some people find a competetive advantage by "hoarding" tires, more power them. I can barely afford used tires, let alone new ones, so should there be a rule that says everyone should have to run o
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00750.html (12,282 bytes)

11. Re: Prepared Cantillever Tire Rule Vent (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:02:36 -0600
.....discontinue the use of the lithium!!! :):):):) I have no opinion in this matter, and thought I had made that clear in my original post. My second hand info is from a competitive driver, and No I
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00751.html (13,995 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu