Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*PC\s+response\s+to\s+stolen\s+car\s+notice\-no\s+autox\s+content\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: rohns@doitnow.com (Jim & Marilyn Rohn)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 09:45:40 -0700 (MST)
In reading and re-reading what I posted about Charlie's original Type R stolen car post, I have to "re-think" **HOW** I tried to make my point... Here in a PC format is what might have been understoo
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01030.html (8,841 bytes)

2. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:16:16 -0500
after having one of our cars stolen and realizing that the >local police don't even bother to come out to the "scene" any more I understand your frustration. As a driver of a perceived "rice" rod ('
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01066.html (9,546 bytes)

3. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:36:33 -0700
Perhaps this varies state by state, but I'm pretty sure that in Arizona that one distinguishing fact between a felony and a misdemeanor is the value of the theft. I think the break is over $300 or ov
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01067.html (8,483 bytes)

4. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: Don Miller <turbospl311@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
value is a felony. Don (much smarter now) Miller 68 Datsun Roadster TLS #8 (Not worth 300 according to my wife) ==
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01069.html (9,051 bytes)

5. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: Christopher Roger Cammack <cmack@WPI.EDU>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 23:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
i understand your feelings completely, i recently had my 1984 rx7 stolen, it was all tricked out, got a piddly sum from insurance. having a car stolen really sucks, i dont recommend it. anybody who s
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01112.html (9,717 bytes)

6. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 18:19:16 -0500
Since I'm a radio news guy, I got a news release this past Monday from the Insurance Information Institute that's very timely in this discussion. But I was out of town mid-week and just remembered to
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01357.html (8,750 bytes)

7. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: "Jan Schmidt" <jschmidt@kumc.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 08:09:26 -0500
This info is pretty meaningless. These also happen to be the top selling vehicles last year! What would really be interesting , would be top stolen vehicles as a percentage of their total U.S. sales.
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01373.html (9,241 bytes)

8. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Healy" <mapman1138@interaccess.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 08:31:54 -0500
emotionally) Isn't this pretty much a rehash of the top selling vehicles in America (rearranged a bit)? Is it in absolute numbers, or in percentage of vehicles of that type on the road? Mike
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01374.html (9,131 bytes)

9. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 10:22:01 -0500
That would be interesting to know, Jan. If I get the time next week, I may call the III and see if they've got such a breakout. I'll bet they do! John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01376.html (9,848 bytes)

10. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 10:27:31 -0500
I'm pretty sure it's absolute numbers, Mike. But, as I told Jan in a similar reply, I'm going to try to call the I.I.I. next week and see if they have it broken out by percentage. If I find out anyth
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01377.html (8,204 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu