Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+thoughts\s+on\s+roll\s+cages\s+in\s+SP\s+and\s+SM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+thoughts\s+on\s+roll\s+cages\s+in\s+SP\s+and\s+SM\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Michael_Smith"@ncshealth.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:36:53 -0500; Yes, but SM allows both Stock and SP mods. If you start with an SS legal car, apply all SP mods, and start your SM project from there, you'd have a legal weld-in roll cage. At least, as the rules are; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00764.html (8,239 bytes)
2. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:04:25 -0600; This is a little off topic, but I can't think of a car currently running in SS that's SM legal to begin with. Are there any? -brad; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00765.html (7,564 bytes)
3. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:09:00 -0600; Oops! I think I just answered my own stupid question. You meant "showroom -brad (it's been a long day) in; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00766.html (7,592 bytes)
4. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: Kevin Wenzel <kwenzel@rmsolo.org>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:22:31 -0700; I don't know that the rules would be interpreted that way by a protest committee - people have pointed out already that you can't mix and match. This means that if you want to use an SS-legal car in; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00767.html (8,274 bytes)
5. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:58:14 -0600; This is just the sort of confusion I'd expect. That's why I bored myself silly spelling out all the names in my post rather than the alphabet-soup SCCA acronyms. The "SS" used here did not mean Solo2; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00773.html (8,359 bytes)
6. RE: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Thompson, Adrian (A.L.)" <athomps9@visteon.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:42:30 -0500; I realize that if I want to use a vehicle to SS (Showroom stock) rules in stock I need to comply fully with those rules and only those rules. That's basically cage, fire extinguisher seat brace windo; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00778.html (9,676 bytes)
7. RE: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: Jamie Sculerati <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:07:14 -0500 (EST); Let me try...there's no gray area in the rules. You're trying to match the Showroom Stock, Solo II Stock and Solo II Street Prepared Rules, and there's no overlap. SIIR Section 13 states: "Cars liste; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00780.html (9,362 bytes)
8. RE: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1): Author: "Thompson, Adrian (A.L.)" <athomps9@visteon.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:13:14 -0500; Thanks Jamie, your explanation finally makes sense to me so I'll shut up now Adrian Thompson That's couldn't I'm can gray Let me try...there's no gray area in the rules. You're trying to match the Sh; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00789.html (9,717 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]