Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Neon\s+ACR\s+and\s+the\s+SCCA\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 10:15:19 -0400
<<<Sorry if this sounds irate, but the resemblance isn't even close. I'm not attacking you personally when I say this, Stan, because you wrote what a lot of other people are thinking, too. But if the
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00404.html (8,880 bytes)

2. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: SOLOMIATA@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:41:54 EDT
...and massive tires/wheels, and programmable fuel injection, and intake manifold, and exhaust header, and LSD, and replace those heavy seats, and headshave/gasket match, and underdrive pulleys, and
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00406.html (7,973 bytes)

3. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:45:06 -0500
<snip> ACR in I disagree. The popularity of the Neon in DS is due to large amounts of contingency money attracting the best drivers and the most intensive development efforts, which has a trickle-dow
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00407.html (9,539 bytes)

4. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:56:56 -0500
to == Only the SOHC ACR was/is classed in SSC, the DOHC Neons were/are classed in SSB. There is a definite top end advantage with the DOHC cars over the SOHC cars hence the two different classes. ==
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00409.html (10,875 bytes)

5. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
I cant say anything about the above as I dont know much about SS. Is there a SSA? I thought the SEB classed the car according to its performance in comparison to the other cars. I still see BMW's and
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00410.html (9,962 bytes)

6. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:06:53 -0400
And that it was placed in classes where it could dominate was just a coincidence???? Perception? Take a look at the _times_ at Nationals. It would have won CS, placed in 3rd in BS, and come in 4th in
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00411.html (9,790 bytes)

7. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Is there a SSA class? what cars are in it? R/T's and Sports (95-96) have the same springs 150 front. This is one place I think I actually agree with ole Linnhoff! Why make up for your company's bad d
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00412.html (11,592 bytes)

8. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:25:34 -0400
I believe the DOHC version came out later. They couldn't very well screw all the SSC Neons now, could they? So, for a while Chrysler was given _two_ classes to dominate... You used the expression '(r
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00413.html (9,324 bytes)

9. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 10:25:13 -0500
Now this is really getting wierd. The last couple weeks we have experienced some very bizzare happenings on Team.Net. Katie Kelly agreed with me 3 times in one week. Chuck Davis added my home E-Mail
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00415.html (9,055 bytes)

10. RE: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Lindsay Wilson <lwilson1@ford.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:32:50 -0400
STUFF DELETED: TOTAL HORSEPUCKEY if you ask me!!! SCREW the other manufacturers!!! I say let 'em continue to lose races if they don't care enough to make a better (race)car like Chrysler did/does. So
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00416.html (8,079 bytes)

11. RE: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Phelps" <scott_phelps@gdt1.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:43:53 -0400
Contigency programs have nothing to do with rules. Period. Trunk kits *HAVE* killed the philosophy of SS (SHOWROOM STOCK) racing. If Nissan decides they want to make a trunk kit for the 200 SX SE-R
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00417.html (9,888 bytes)

12. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Michael King <mapco@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:50:52 +0000
Please rest this one. The Neon was appropriately classed when it was classed, whether or not everyone likes it. The only reason people don't like it is they are getting beat by a Neon. The Neon can b
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00418.html (9,812 bytes)

13. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:50:23 -0500
over screw == The Neons must be good cars to being with or they wouldn't have "dominated" either class. Hmm, guess Chrysler did some good R&D work and made a good car. I a == I did that because we a
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00419.html (10,882 bytes)

14. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:48:25 -0500
just a Look at the drivers who have won in this "dominant" car. Is it your position that those folks would NOT win in another car? have won _perception_??? Yep. Given the variations in conditions ove
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00421.html (10,070 bytes)

15. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:00:55 -0400
Or someone in the SCCA decided they wanted all that attention (and money) from Chrysler. Don't get me wrong - I think both camps could have had their cake and eaten it too if they had made the wise d
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00423.html (10,288 bytes)

16. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:09:47 -0400
I dunno. Lets have them swap cars at the next Nationals and find out. I will contend that top drivers are attracted to the cars that have the best chance of winning not the other way around. Look at
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00424.html (10,735 bytes)

17. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:16:14 -0500
--> effective means of Allowing (More $ for variety of contestants. == No, I wholeheartedly DO want a diverse field of (race)cars. Please don't take this personally as it's not intended as an attack
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00425.html (11,211 bytes)

18. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:09:14 -0400
On or about 12:09 PM 6/9/1999 , Paul Foster did say: Uh...i was under the silly impression that cars were classes according to their ability, not their configuration. If they are classed by configura
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00427.html (8,658 bytes)

19. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:30:43 -0400
On or about 12:16 PM 6/9/1999 , Eric Linnhoff did say: Not that i agree with trunk kits, BUT... It's not that other companies are too stupid to put out a better race car, it's that they didn't skimp
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00429.html (9,172 bytes)

20. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:39:13 -0500
<snip> basis, You're assuming the CAR is responsible for this performance. If you take the best DRIVERS and put them in a mediocre car, they'll STILL win. picture? Because there's nothing wrong. Best
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00430.html (9,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu