- 1. Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 08:23:01 -0700
- I was truly blown away by some of the stronger "go away and leave us alone - we're happy" responses to my suggestion to make some movement back towards "Stock is Stock" concept. It reminded me of a s
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01429.html (9,262 bytes)
- 2. Re: Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Franson <cfranson@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:14:29 -0400
- Not to keep beating the dead horse, but how many people (not necessarily autocrossers) do you know who drive a car which would actually be legal in this "pure stock" class? When people put mufflers o
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01432.html (9,895 bytes)
- 3. Re: Looking at Stock from the other angle (score: 1)
- Author: Stephen Bernard <solo-2@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 01:32:38 -0400
- I did notice that you didn't respond to the e-mail that I sent you Scot. But I am in stock and and I AM here. What you propose would NOT affect me since my car is 100% factory stock with nothing at
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01476.html (8,721 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu