- 1. Re: Katie Kelly protest (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Blankenship <jblanken@itds.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 15:01:23 CDT
- I'm with you 100% on this. (Joining the lynch mob in the heat of the moment) I thought the rulebook already states that some dimensional variance is allowed for aftermarket shocks/struts, which may b
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00963.html (12,382 bytes)
- 2. RE: Katie Kelly protest (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 13:41:58 -0700
- I've cut some of Jeff's wording out here, and am responding to a few of the specifics I left out in my response... The rule (Appendix G) says that the spring perch height can be 'no lower than' the f
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00969.html (13,291 bytes)
- 3. Re: Katie Kelly protest (score: 1)
- Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:02:17 -0500
- All things considered, given your description of the situation, it's not a weenie protest. However, it IS pretty uncool. You could have thought of a more tactful and considerate way to make your "cas
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00971.html (6,799 bytes)
- 4. Re: Katie Kelly protest (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:31:49 EDT
- I think the whole thing's just another one of those underhanded, feminist plots intended to confuse and manipulate the superior numnut gender into a more submissive role. Mark Sipe (ducking) :-)
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00992.html (6,648 bytes)
- 5. RE: Katie Kelly protest (score: 1)
- Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:16:33 -0700
- Mark Sipe writes... Yes, Mark, you have nailed this on the head. Katie (just got back to work, and this is the first post I read. Can't wait to read the rest!)
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01064.html (7,525 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu