Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+sway\s+bar\s+rules\s+in\s+stock\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+sway\s+bar\s+rules\s+in\s+stock\.\.\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: David Shreve <vw_speed_racer@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 19:19:00 PDT; Okay, I have a friend who has a '99 Miata. He has installed the Racing Beat front sway bar and the tie bar that goes between the stock mounts and stiffens them. There is no drilling or other modifica; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01136.html (8,472 bytes)
2. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:46:00 -0500; Front swaybar is free in stock class, probably even if the car came without one, though I'm sure a Miata did. Strut braces are not swaybars. If he wants to run his Miata in CSP, he can run his strut; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01137.html (9,119 bytes)
3. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: David Shreve <vw_speed_racer@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:10:29 PDT; That's just the thing, though...it's not a strut tie bar--it's a sway bar mount tie bar. After re-reading the rules, I'm beginning to think it's illegal, though. Anyone think it might be legal??? -d; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01138.html (7,884 bytes)
4. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Chris Teague" <cteague@home.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:00:46 -0700; The way I read the rule book, the end link that attaches the sway bar to the strut, body, frame, or suspension is part of the mounting hardware for the sway bar, and therefore is free to be replaced; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01140.html (8,652 bytes)
5. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:59:04 EDT; The original question was whether or not it is legal to add a stiffening device to the Miata's front swaybar chassis bracket mounting points. RX7TT's have the same problem. It is not legal IMO, but b; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01150.html (7,918 bytes)
6. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:45:18 -0500; It only says "mounting bolts" (I have a 1998 book). Logically, the only reason to drill holes is for bolts to mount BRACKETS. If the stock brackets are there and are going to be used, there is no rea; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01209.html (10,098 bytes)
7. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:31:45 -0700; The magic wording is to call the piece a 'front sway bar mounting bracket'. BTW, if you use heim jointed endlinks (like the stock 99 links), the mounts should not crack. My 94 and 96 never cracked th; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01225.html (8,504 bytes)
8. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:59:32 EDT; << The way I think the rule ought to be applied is that the entire sway-bar SYSTEM is unrestricted, but that the existing frame and body may not be chopped on to install the system. If it is a sway-b; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01233.html (9,739 bytes)
9. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:00:06 -0500; allowance range someone framework And wouldn't change. See the rule below, which I had no intention of changing: == 13.7.A.2. Substitution, addition or removal of anti-roll bars may serve no other pu; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01250.html (8,917 bytes)
10. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Jan Schmidt" <jschmidt@kumc.edu>; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:51:37 -0500; I will take the stock sway bar rule one step further if I was a rules maker. "Front or Rear sway bar may be deleted, added or replaced. One or the other , but not both." That way a rear drive car co; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01261.html (13,757 bytes)
11. Re: Front sway bar rules in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:18:06 -0500; maker. "Front or Rear sway bar may be deleted, added or replaced. One or the other , but not both." That way a rear drive car could replace the front bar and a front driver could replace the rear bar; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01268.html (8,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]