- 1. Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:34:38 EDT
- The claim that the Evansville courses were *power* courses is incorrect. Yes, there were some great places to go fast, but the reason a class like A Stock gets beat by B & C Stock is because the cour
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00140.html (7,590 bytes)
- 2. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1)
- Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 21:46:11 -0500
- I didn't attend those, but I have to go along with the Sipester on this. Very fun courses. It is the surface that perplexed me. (My first time in Evansville) Very rough in places, with varying degree
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00147.html (7,311 bytes)
- 3. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1)
- Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:55:59 EDT
- << Not having to slow down as much has it's benefits and top-notch drivers like Priebe & Braun made maximum use of the advantage. >> So, why would an AS MR2 have to slow down more than a CS MR2? I un
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00150.html (7,122 bytes)
- 4. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1)
- Author: Kii Lockhorn <kiirenza@erols.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 12:37:10 -0700
- I sorta agree with Mark. However, the ability to not only go fast, but also *maintain* that speed in FS and "high power" classes was also definitely a factor in who won (at least with FS, and but lik
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00179.html (7,953 bytes)
- 5. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1)
- Author: GSMnow@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 02:39:55 EDT
- << I sorta agree with Mark. However, the ability to not only go fast, but also << *maintain* that speed in FS and "high power" classes was also definitely a << factor in who won (at least with FS, an
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00248.html (9,369 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu