Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Effects\s+of\s+Current\s+Rules\s+\-\s+an\s+Observation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Effects\s+of\s+Current\s+Rules\s+\-\s+an\s+Observation\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:19:09 -0500; I was kinda half-reading the thread on wheel size changes in Stock, when I stumbled across this little gem of a quote: <<The guy I protested for the 6" rims, and who had argued strenuously that they; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01023.html (12,165 bytes)
2. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:39:56 -0800; Well I would have to say this is nicely written, and extremelly friendly. So I attempt to respond in like kind. Although I am sure you will be hammered by others. Let first me say I do not agree with; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01026.html (12,336 bytes)
3. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:14:49 -0500; I have no interest in the politics side of the club, but... and our Semantics, dude! They "volunteer" to "work" for us. If they don't want to "work" for us/our sport, they should not "volunteer" for; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01029.html (8,248 bytes)
4. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:15:06 -0800; dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote, re my account of a protest I had filed: <snip> Can't say as I was in any way concerned what someone like yourself would think. I knew perfectly well what I was doing.; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01030.html (15,589 bytes)
5. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:47:27 -0800; in the best horshack voice: oooh, ooooooh, oooooooh! I know! I KNOW!! *Everything*?!?!?? BWA HAAAH AAA HEh he hee ehe ;-) sbw; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01032.html (9,286 bytes)
6. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:51:13 -0500; This is an entirely reasonable suggestion, but it contains a serious problem: the possible Balkanization of various Regional rulebooks. For people who compete entirely within a given Region, no prob; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01033.html (12,717 bytes)
7. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:57:38 -0600; SBW quips: *Everything*?!?!?? Good one. That's "being offended by" as opposed to "offending" everyone, right? ;<) ( see the smiley ?) Jay; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01034.html (8,513 bytes)
8. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:01:17 -0500; I was afraid this would happen, but took the chance that it wouldn't in order to create a little thoughtful discussion. Jay, the initial post most emphatically was not directed at you personally - th; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01035.html (8,932 bytes)
9. RE: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:23:09 -0600; Maybe it was the DRIVER that was not competitive. Apparently he was not enjoying it unless he could win. Would he have stopped there? Does this mean that any less competent competitor should be allo; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01036.html (10,533 bytes)
10. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:17:50 -0800; I fail to understand your reference. Webster defines Balkanize: To divide a region or territory into small, often hostile units. As you sasying the rule books will become hostile, or the neighboring; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01039.html (14,379 bytes)
11. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:32:48 -0500 (EST); I think he was saying that for folks like me that don't mind travelling to different regions and want to run pretty much every weekend that lots of local customization of the rulebook could make our; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01040.html (10,120 bytes)
12. Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: Rob Foley <103535.536@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:39:16 -0500; works for Us, the Membership. If We decide that specific car allowences are what We want, then the SEB had better put its heels together and do it. The SEB works for the Members, not vice versa. (sor; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01041.html (13,138 bytes)
13. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:41:40 -0800; Basically what I said in my original post My personal opinion on the whole protest thing is that any protest at the I would agree with this. The secnario give appeared with two individuals who did no; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01042.html (10,552 bytes)
14. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: Pat MacAvoy <patmac@tridelta.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:24:03 -0500 (EST); As one that ran in at least 6 regoins (that I can recall, offhand) last year, I have to agree with the consistent rulebook. Maybe. I have to take exception to this... I am involved in a region where; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01043.html (11,635 bytes)
15. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:55:55 -0500; If each region defines its own special allowences per class, then there is a high probability that there will exist differences in what is/is not allowed in each region's implementation of that class; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01044.html (13,181 bytes)
16. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:10:17 -0500; Uhhhh... no. This scenario is different than the one I stated - see "trade wins"? However, there's nothing wrong with inspecting a car that you _really_ suspect is illegal, and if you do find someth; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01046.html (10,547 bytes)
17. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:41:27 -0500; Let me start by saying that in general, I think you're way off base in most of what you're proposing. You're not looking at the big picture, even though you seem to think you are. Or more particularl; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01048.html (14,415 bytes)
18. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:43:45 -0500; Kool. Great. Aha! Why must all changes be catagory wide? Why not? I'm not being facitious, I'm serious. Why not? Has it ever been tried? Been given serious consideration? Well, if (and that's a MIGH; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01049.html (12,707 bytes)
19. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: A4autox@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:51:27 EST; << in a wins of by the WRONG!! a wennie protest would be to toss paper on the missing cigarette lighter, or missing piece of rubber molding, if "B" was running to large of wheels, to bad, he was chea; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01050.html (10,676 bytes)
20. Re: Effects of Current Rules - an Observation (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:21:54 -0500; That's fine. ...or perhaps we have different opinions on what the big picture looks like. Well, it would have to be a competitor, who felt that he was operating under some handicap, who would then h; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01052.html (13,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]