- 1. Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 18:17:15 -0400
- Hm, my last post has stirred up a bit of a hornet's nest in private e-mail, about the relative ranking of driver X versus driver Y. That's fine - discussions like these have been going on since sport
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00852.html (10,908 bytes)
- 2. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 19:24:49 EDT
- Damn DG, you got too much time on your hands!!!!! <GRIN> As for all the griping about how certain cars simply dominate their respective classes, another very important point to remember is the time,
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00860.html (7,511 bytes)
- 3. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 01:14:15 -0700
- Wilma or Betty??? Ginger or Mary Ann???
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00894.html (6,843 bytes)
- 4. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Right. Which clearly supports the move of the M3 to CSP. After all, _lot's_ of drivers had been doing SP M3's and found them uncompetitive. Oh wait... no they didn't. Oh well, at least a very well s
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00899.html (7,251 bytes)
- 5. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
- M3 _FROM_ CSP. Stupid fingers. I hate it when I try to be a smartass and fat-finger it up... :-) Mark
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00900.html (6,957 bytes)
- 6. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: Scot Zediker <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 09:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Kirk or Spock? Dick York or Dick Sargent? Dave or Sammy? Scot
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00906.html (7,230 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu