Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Do\s+you\s+care\s+about\s+SCCA\s+headquarters\s+relocation\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Do\s+you\s+care\s+about\s+SCCA\s+headquarters\s+relocation\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Do you care about SCCA headquarters relocation? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier"<pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:21:51 GMT; I suppose Westport is out of the question? Phil "Hey, that's where is was when I joined" Ethier; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00438.html (6,739 bytes)
2. Re: Do you care about SCCA headquarters relocation? (score: 1): Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:58:40 -0400; Phil's suggestion is perfect for me!! C'mon Rocky and Lindsay, let's bring SCCA back home! Wait a minute. Didn't SCCA buy/build the structure in Englewood? Me thinks it should stay in the purchased f; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00446.html (7,463 bytes)
3. RE: Do you care about SCCA headquarters relocation? (score: 1): Author: "Wilson, Lindsay" <lindsay.wilson@intel.com>; Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:18:33 -0700; FYI, the building was sold about 2 years ago. The proceeds are in a sequestered account. Only the interest can be used towards the lease costs. The principal is set aside for purchase of a new buildi; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00448.html (7,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]