- 1. Contour 6 cylinder classing (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Seamon" <seamorob@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 17:07:44 GMT
- Speaking of the new stock class memo: http://www.scca.org/news/tech/seb/1100memo.html#memo I hope someone else noticed that there is no Contour 6 cylinder listed in there. (or SVT for that matter) Ro
- /html/autox/2000-11/msg00017.html (6,986 bytes)
- 2. Re: Contour 6 cylinder classing (score: 1)
- Author: David K Yeung <dkyeung@juno.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:49:49 -0600
- there are ALOT of cars missing in the new listing....I suppose the SCAC has decided there are too many cars listed that never show up to nationals so there's no reason to carry it in their rulebook.
- /html/autox/2000-11/msg00024.html (8,083 bytes)
- 3. Re: Contour 6 cylinder classing (score: 1)
- Author: brandon.fetch@ey.com
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:19:22 -0600
- from the 9/26/200 SEB minutes, proposed for 2001: "Cars which are classed only by the designation NOC (Not Otherwise Classified) or by catch-all instead of by specific model, in Appendix A Stock Cate
- /html/autox/2000-11/msg00027.html (8,659 bytes)
- 4. Re: Contour 6 cylinder classing (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:31:19 EST
- << This response is somewhat in jest, but still.... Whoever menitoned a few days back about the Civic SI where it was originally classed in the late 80's was right. Sometimes the board DOESN'T think
- /html/autox/2000-11/msg00040.html (7,516 bytes)
- 5. Re: Contour 6 cylinder classing (score: 1)
- Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 21:15:35 -0600
- Hey! Don't lay it on our doorstep. Write to the people who can do something about it. This is not SCCA.com. Pat (only half kidding) Washburn
- /html/autox/2000-11/msg00051.html (6,959 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu