- 1. Blown CRX (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Couture <stevecouture@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
- A debate as to whether or not this is a real picture has been going on (and on, and on, and on...) through the neon mailing list. I'm not going to make a call either way, I just think it is so funny
- /html/autox/1999-04/msg01048.html (6,775 bytes)
- 2. RE: Blown CRX (score: 1)
- Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 09:32:42 -0500
- So..does this car deserve to be called a CRX anymore? No. *heh* And..does the Prolong car really use Prolong? No. Dont get me started on the brand of NGKs the Splitfire car uses either..
- /html/autox/1999-04/msg01052.html (7,337 bytes)
- 3. Re: Blown CRX (score: 1)
- Author: Tommy Regan <tommy_regan@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
- It could easily be a fake, but it also could easily be a truck and tractor pull competitor judging by the obvious front end weight and rear tire tread pattern. From the "license plate" and the van in
- /html/autox/1999-04/msg01081.html (6,746 bytes)
- 4. Re: Blown CRX (score: 1)
- Author: RJ & Bridgette <rowan@gwis.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 07:42:21 -0400
- Yup, you called that one. They do things a little differently in Holland. Here are some more pics: http://www.crxclubholland.nl/images/extreem/ I can't seem to find the actual page describing their e
- /html/autox/1999-04/msg01100.html (7,225 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu