Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Autocross\s+Timing\/Scoring\s+Software\s+$and\s+hardware\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Autocross\s+Timing\/Scoring\s+Software\s+$and\s+hardware\?$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 11:52:37 EDT; << I agree, that makes good sense. I was thinking of it from this point of view: (1) There seem to be a lot of folks out there willing to use PC architectures and Microsoft OS combos for timing, livi; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00018.html (12,339 bytes)
2. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:18:14 -0400 (EDT); With the large caveat that I'm not planning on writing any scoring software and won't be any time soon, I'd prefer to see the absolute time of every start and finish. Otherwise the box needs to know; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00026.html (8,346 bytes)
3. RE: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:23:24 -0400; There is a "box" that already does this. Its the TAG CP-505. Its just a very accurate, triggerable clock. When a timing light is broken its sends the time of day and the trigger number down the wire; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00047.html (9,386 bytes)
4. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 17:52:37 -0400; Doesn't ski racing time to the hundredth not thousandth like we do? Matt Murray mailto:mattm@optonline.net mailto:mdmurray@gwns.com a very the I use assigned to a between I don't for racing [SMTP:mar; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00065.html (10,127 bytes)
5. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <apozner@epix.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 21:19:24 -0400; Perhaps, but the TAG unit gives at least .001 accuracy (once again I don't have the literature infront of me ) Regards, Alan; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00088.html (10,878 bytes)
6. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 09:22:27 -0400; I know that the JACircuts unit is designed to be accurate down to 10,000th of a second (John can correct me if I'm wrong). It tosses the 10,000th digit and uses 1000th of a second. Sounds like maybe; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00099.html (8,349 bytes)
7. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: "Glen E. Thompson" <glen.thompson@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 23:33:53 -0400; They only report to the hundredth of a second. As timing systems got more precise the decision was made to limit scoring to hundredths. Even though the equipment may be able to measure more accuratel; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00194.html (9,212 bytes)
8. Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software (and hardware?) (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 06:51:52 -0500; Not sure, but there would then be 3 and 4 way ties in DS. I guess I would rather know I lost by .001 than to be called a tie. It think the accuracy we time to also tells something about what kind of; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00196.html (8,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]