Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+New\s+SAC\s+proposals\s+\-\s+June\s+FastTrack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+New\s+SAC\s+proposals\s+\-\s+June\s+FastTrack\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [evolution-disc.] New SAC proposals - June FastTrack (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:55:07 -0500; One thing I forgot to mention. Please consider how the introduction of new cars like the RX8 and 350Z will mix in to these proposals, and also upgrades to existing cars such as the rumoured Boxster e; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00392.html (9,140 bytes)
2. Re: [evolution-disc.] New SAC proposals - June FastTrack (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 02:34:45 -0400 (EDT); Concept #1 seems a bit silly to me. We've happily encouraged C4 vette owners to come back and play in stock and now we're gonna hit 'em with RX-7TT's and Boxster S's? All you're doing there is excha; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00398.html (8,671 bytes)
3. RE: [evolution-disc.] New SAC proposals - June FastTrack (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:03:06 -0500; Just so people don't forget, Concept #2 was alluded to as a possibility when the final printed version of the reorg was approved by the SCCA BOD last Fall (http://www.scca.org/news/fastrack/01-12.pdf; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00407.html (10,645 bytes)
4. Re: [evolution-disc.] New SAC proposals - June FastTrack (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DRAM Repair <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:38:00 -0600; I have to agree with Mark in that we need to promote some sort of rule at least try the new format before making changes. I'm an AS driver (C4 vette) and I'm just now getting my 1st realistic chance; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00423.html (10,244 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]