Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"ZX2\s+S\/R\"\.\.\.trunk\s+kits\s+anyone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"ZX2\s+S\/R\"\.\.\.trunk\s+kits\s+anyone\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: Whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:22:50 -0500; If I understand the literature right, the S/R is essentially ford's 'trunk kit' for SS racing, don't normal cars (like civic's and SE-R's) with not quite so readily available, but SCCA club racing ap; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00331.html (8,070 bytes)
2. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Phillip S. Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 21:41:30 -0400; that these parts are factory installed, whereas the trunk kits for various cars come in the trunk as delivered to dealers. However, doesn't the comp board have to approve particular items included i; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00341.html (8,967 bytes)
3. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 00:49:19 -0700; ++++== Well, in my opinion, the S/R differs from SCCA "trunk kit" cars in that the ZX-2 S/R is/will be available through a retail deal just as the Neon ACRs are, were, are, oh whatever. (Although, I; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00352.html (9,202 bytes)
4. "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Robert & Katherine Seamon" <forestg@ionet.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:49:17 -0500; The trunk kit for the ZX2 is M3000-ZX2 (I think) and it is NOT the same as an S/R model from the dealer. The trunk kit consists of the of the coil over suspension and appropriate dampers plus the adj; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00367.html (8,122 bytes)
5. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blankenship <jblanken@itds.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 10:07:14 CDT; Excellent point. Kinda illustrates a pet peeve of mine, that SS is dead, killed by the trunk kit. *sob* Sorry if this sounds irate, but the resemblance isn't even close. I'm not attacking you persona; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00372.html (9,568 bytes)
6. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:53:22 -0400; lot the speed You did a good job of it. :) Owning a Tracer (Mercury Escort), I'm somewhat partial toward the Fords, but I'm no dummy about the performance. A Neon R/T will smoke a ZX-2 any day for s; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00377.html (9,152 bytes)
7. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: Ian McCloghrie <ian@codrus.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 14:27:44 -0700; I'll give you handling, and maybe braking (although the figures I've seen show 140-150 ft 60-0 distance for both zx2 and Neon), but as far as acceleration goes I think the zx2 has it. A friend of min; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00390.html (8,196 bytes)
8. RE: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: Lindsay Wilson <lwilson1@ford.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:15:25 -0400; I believe that the real disadvantage of the ZX2, even with the S/R option package, is the lack of negative camber which is achievable. While the Neon has camber adjustment in the shop manual, the ZX2; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00391.html (10,725 bytes)
9. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...trunk kits anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 19:57:24 -0400; It'll be interesting to compare 0-60 times, something I haven't done. The ZX-2 Hot with the 140hp Zetec of the Contour should move the smaller car right along. Body roll and ride height can be easil; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00394.html (8,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]