- 1. "Voluntary bumping" (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:51:28 -0700
- I think the problem here is that you (Mark) have a different definition of this "voluntary bumping" term than we (Rocky and I) have. My definition is the ability to use the bumping order in appendix
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01235.html (10,301 bytes)
- 2. Re: "Voluntary bumping" (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Shaw <autox@inficad.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:23:55 -0700
- Bingo.. Glad we finally agree. Guess I poorly defined my argument...? Based on the crazy protests that have occurred over the years, if you place yourself into another class by following the rules...
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01290.html (7,226 bytes)
- 3. Re: "Voluntary bumping" (score: 1)
- Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:28:58 -0700
- Well, we still disagree about something ... I don't think it's legal to put yourself into another class via appendix B. I think it's legal via Appendix A. I.e., you can run a Miata in EP, but not in
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01309.html (6,973 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu