- 181. Re: Corvette Grand Sport in B/SP (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:20:37 -0800
- If you are fairley serious about the prep level I think it can be very competitive. They don't need much, mostly a diet ;-) sbw
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00719.html (7,148 bytes)
- 182. Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:27:40 -0800
- For your amusement, a copy of letter sent to SEB a We
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00828.html (9,989 bytes)
- 183. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:33:41 -0800
- That's Glad I could help, besides I was a little bored ;-) Except that the precident was already set with the 12"/13" rule, same, same in my book ;-) Even if you kept tire OD the better Tire OD doesn
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00838.html (9,829 bytes)
- 184. Re: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:35:32 -0800
- Uhuh, and since when are Saleens legal in stock junior? Who's ignorant? Try again. sbw 18"
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00839.html (9,990 bytes)
- 185. Re: Your letter on 18" rubber (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:39:35 -0800
- Yes and very good point Pat, BUT, there is already a precident on the 12"/13" rule and weakness is hardly compared to not being able to compete for lack of rubber. sbw
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00842.html (8,145 bytes)
- 186. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:42:30 -0800
- Ok Al, I think you better look again, there are NO A/X compound available. Road race yes, A/X no. Same bullshi*( I heard 2 years ago! How long we gonna run around with our heads in the sand? sbw cann
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00843.html (10,278 bytes)
- 187. Re: Your letter on 18" rubber (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:11:49 -0800
- Same crap they said 2 years ago, it aint happenin. We gotta get our heads out of the sand. I dissagree, the rule was written cuz there were no tires available, PERIOD! What's different now? There hav
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00846.html (8,085 bytes)
- 188. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:22:03 -0800
- Check the tire rack website, or better yet, try to order some ;-) sbw our
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00850.html (10,287 bytes)
- 189. Re: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:49:48 -0800
- I thought it was clear I was making a joke about ignorance. I don't understand your need to be insulting. Most people accompany a *joke* with a *;-)* If you were kidding, I apologise for insulting yo
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00854.html (10,835 bytes)
- 190. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 07:54:55 -0800
- Gee, that doesn't sound like the same crap Bruce and Dave told the SCAC and the SEB 2 years ago or anything ;-) Seriously, Rob. How is it fair that you have many choices for tires and I have one? AND
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00866.html (12,021 bytes)
- 191. Re: So would it be better... (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 07:58:18 -0800
- Well, they might not go *off* as fast ;-) was True, but now we are hearing the same crap as we heard 2 years ago, *it's comin, it's comin*. How full of ourself are we to think that we matter at all t
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00867.html (8,087 bytes)
- 192. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:26:39 -0800
- drive Uhuh, I wonder how this deal would go if it was the hot new miata for miata stock instead of Corvettes and Porsches ;-) Sooooooo junior, who's side are you on? Except for the fact that you are
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00879.html (10,870 bytes)
- 193. Re: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:31:13 -0800
- On the '98s, you have an option of getting 245/40/ZR18's on 18x8.5s on the front and 295/35/ZR18's on 18x10s on the rear. Ok, so what do they come with stock? Can you get them with 17" wheels at all?
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00881.html (10,250 bytes)
- 194. Re: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:57:38 -0800
- Yes Then it is not a problem for this car as long as you can ordeer them with 17" I don't believe so. Don't know? sbw
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00890.html (10,664 bytes)
- 195. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:56:30 -0800
- and I And I would agree with that except that I don't know how to spell that word ;-) Yes it was and I see this as different because the items you talk about are maintanence or reliability issues tha
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00891.html (10,470 bytes)
- 196. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:41:53 -0800
- Geeeze, watch my lips this time and I'll say it real slooooooooowwwwwww for you to understand. Remember the 12"13" rule? Same thing. And you are responsible for how many rule changes or reclassificat
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00900.html (12,161 bytes)
- 197. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:37:34 -0800
- Ok, so how come the C5 and the C4S are in SS? If they are classed according to having to run on street tires?? I am confused here Mark, what are you sayting? sbw
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00901.html (10,517 bytes)
- 198. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:58:02 -0800
- --Original Message-- From: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu> To: Scotty *BOB* White <we2fat4asp@seanet.com> Cc: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; autox mailing list <autox@autox.team.net> D
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00904.html (10,389 bytes)
- 199. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:07:23 -0800
- Now THAT sounds complicated to me, how long, when do you reclass it? Why not just make an allowence and then remove it when rubber becomes available, OR make an allowence and then reclass the car ;-)
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00906.html (11,132 bytes)
- 200. Re: Fw: 18" rubber? Talk amongst yerselves ;-) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:26:25 -0800
- SIPE! Goddammit, did you steal Sirota's email account again???!!!? ;-) mark, lemmy start again, in 94 the cars were competitive and had tires available because they were 17" See? In 97, 98, 99 they d
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00909.html (11,531 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu