- 141. Re: Earning Trophies? Nope. (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:38:14 -0700
- Still no sale here (Jim and I have discussed this concept a 'few' times before). I really believe that few folks accept the "earned" statement for simply "showing up". Even those with those "trophies
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00981.html (8,525 bytes)
- 142. Trophy Philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:34:04 -0700
- This is what *should* be done. Like having to run with your class or you can't run, or we'll let you run but not for Series points? Oh - that's another area of disagreement :-) Where did I put my chi
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01107.html (8,729 bytes)
- 143. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:15:43 -0700
- There is no longer bumping allowed for single car classes? Was it taken from the rule book? Scott Meyers
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01121.html (7,559 bytes)
- 144. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:44:28 -0700
- The original premise was at local events to provide competition for single cars.....With Pax available these days I would favor a Pax/Stock or Pax/Prepared type classes for single cars. For many of u
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01129.html (7,964 bytes)
- 145. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:45:11 -0700
- No, but it can be the established format of the event, as put forward in the supps, that any single car class will be "bumped". I still favor a Pax grouping for single cars however, and think it far
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01163.html (7,809 bytes)
- 146. Re: Neon weight (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:42:40 -0700
- Major snippage..... My 1996 Neon ACR Coupe weighed *with A/C*, 1/4 tank of gas, spare tire out and no other options 2345# on local SCCA car scales when we corner weighed it. BTW - I found two of them
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01241.html (7,350 bytes)
- 147. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:45:14 -0700
- Someone else wrote...... Another fairly easy way to reduce oversteer and promote the rear end being more obedient is to adjust the rear toe if allowed by factory methods. Try zero rear toe first (man
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01287.html (8,746 bytes)
- 148. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? Oops... :-) (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:00:00 -0700
- Reduce OVERSTEER? I thought it said UNDERSTEER? I've never owned a FWD car that from the factory oversteered, they all understeered. Adjust your reading of the earlier advice accordingly, and just re
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01288.html (6,913 bytes)
- 149. Re: Petition to amend SCCA bylaws (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:06:00 -0700
- Believe it, it is accurate. I do not recall who, but when I heard this some time back it was indeed confirmed by one of the designated SCCA "officials". I think it was finally even published after ma
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01306.html (9,724 bytes)
- 150. Re: Petition to amend SCCA bylaws (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:54:24 -0700
- Is there a published copy of the Solo 2 section of the SCCA budget, or the entire budget? Income, expenditures, debits, credits, and all that other accountant stuff? It would be interesting to have s
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01334.html (9,000 bytes)
- 151. Re: Trophies and Number of Classes - Are they related? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:15:10 -0700
- We average between 120 to 140 entrants, but with 39 different classes to enter, it doesn't take a math whiz to see what the real problem is. The statistical average per class would be..........quick
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01345.html (9,125 bytes)
- 152. Re: Basic Budget 101 (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:07:53 -0700
- It appears that Pro Solo and Solo 2 are lumped together? Where does Solo 1 fall? Under whose umbrella? Same one? Membership dues - is that where the little boxes kick in? Just that section alone coul
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01348.html (8,024 bytes)
- 153. Re: Spokes: Re: Big Swaybar Woes... (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:02:20 -0700
- And so the game begins anew. The dance of the neurotics when it comes to the explicit, minute, microscopic reading of the rule book to disqualify someone for making a legal modification to their car.
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01369.html (9,228 bytes)
- 154. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars..... (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:39:59 -0700
- It behooves any event organizer to establish a balance of cars and classes. It is our responsibility to provide an opportunity for invigorating competition. Most competitors that I have spoken to rel
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01372.html (11,018 bytes)
- 155. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars.....(Street Tire (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 08:33:37 -0700
- After four events we reclass any previous Novice into another class. Some regions wait until the "Novice" scores a trophy - for some this would be a long wait... :-) Other regions wait eight events b
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01375.html (8,967 bytes)
- 156. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars..... (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 11:31:10 -0700
- Not necessarily alone there. Can you imagine how many more pages the rule book would have to be to define in infinite detail exactly what constituted a "Street Tire" ? ;-) Now that is interesting - I
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01383.html (8,126 bytes)
- 157. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars.....Oops (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 11:35:50 -0700
- That was FACTOR.......we have enough actors. See? Scott
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01385.html (6,888 bytes)
- 158. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? Hoo-boy!! (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:08:47 -0700
- D Stock would make no sense - 155hp with some good stuff vs 200hp (give or take) with a *bunch* of good stuff. Nope IMHO. C Stock.....maybe. Against 135hp with mid engine, hard to compare, might vary
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01396.html (8,246 bytes)
- 159. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:24:11 -0700
- Uh, for **US** in D Stock? No way you might underestimate the potential here, right Dan? Cars about the same weight, 50 more horsepower, and a bunch more suspension,,,,,yeah, sounds about fair ;-) Do
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01410.html (8,510 bytes)
- 160. Re: Type R's in DS WAS: Type R: G Stock in 2000? (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 22:38:30 -0700
- Drugs, It's gotta be drugs..... ;-) Scott Meyers
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01421.html (7,367 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu