- 21. RE: Slotted rotors legal in SP? (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:09:15 -0500
- Rule reads about the same. This falls under "if it doesn't say you can then you can't" Rotors not mentioned, therefore could not be changed. I'd guess not. I would be astounded if the SCCA Solo2 Stre
- /html/autox/2001-05/msg00609.html (8,030 bytes)
- 22. RE: Dennis's Agenda (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:50:18 -0500
- I have been reading all of this and if the above is your true opinion then it doesn't fly. No way this works without screwing the SP people. I agree with most of what Jay, Keith, Eric and Ron have sa
- /html/autox/2001-04/msg00804.html (7,109 bytes)
- 23. RE: ITB Audi 4000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:55:18 -0500
- IT cars that meet current GCR go into SP class for that car, this would be My rule book is on the way, but wanted to ask where an ITB (road racing class) Audi 4000 would fit in Solo 2. Thanks Greg pr
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00751.html (6,828 bytes)
- 24. RE: SM/2 a go for 2001 (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:05:19 -0500
- can an SM car beat AP, should be able to, you can do much more in SM engine wise than you can in P, How about an V8 BMW in a 2002 body, should have more HP than anything you could come up with in P a
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00753.html (8,692 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu