Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:larry_spector@flashmail.com: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ST Classification..any solid rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Spector" <larry_spector@flashmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 21:47:48 -0400
But what if it has a normally aspirated sibling that IS allowed? If the NA version of the Eclipse is allowed in ST, is its big brother (either AWD or FWD) allowed in STU if the only differences betwe
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00066.html (8,849 bytes)

2. Re: ST Classification..any solid rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Spector" <larry_spector@flashmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 10:45:24 -0500
That was my assumption. I thought that forced induction was allowed in STU. If that's not true then forget what I said... If it is true however- if you started with a non-turbo car and added the fact
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00095.html (8,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu