Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimmistick@hotmail.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 10 year Maximum Age for Stock Class (was Reclassing) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Mistick" <jimmistick@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 21:19:50 +0000
So the discussion is that if I spend a couple thousand dollars to restore my 1975 280Z to factory condition (like I'm planning) I'm not able to run in it stock? What is the reasoning behind that? Who
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00014.html (9,558 bytes)

2. Re: Stock Class Model Year Exclusion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Mistick" <jimmistick@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:10:21 +0000
First and foremost IF we went to a 7/10 year rule in stock, the SCAC/SEB would have a much easier time of classing cars. Probably 70% of the cars listed in the rule book would be gone from NATIONAL c
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00053.html (9,981 bytes)

3. Re: ax-digest V1 #805 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Mistick" <jimmistick@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 18:13:16
I own a supercharged CRX (former yellow GRM project car) and a '75 280Z. Thanks to SM2, I'm finally out of EM and FP. My opinion is that there ARE cars that fit SM2 out there, it's just that some dr
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00201.html (9,009 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu