Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

301. Re: Bushings in stock? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:37:46 -0500
bushings? Nope. Can't change swaybar or suspension bushings in back. shocks/springs, which Shocks, but definitely NOT springs. And the shocks can't alter spring perch location or suspension geometry.
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01174.html (7,214 bytes)

302. Re: how about a new Pro Solo class? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 08:55:19 -0500
Don't mind me. The structure of Really, Seriously, No Kidding, This Is Professional Motorsports Solo allows for car models to be excluded even at the Stock level. Older cars don't generally create m
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01470.html (8,581 bytes)

303. Re: Kudos to NAP and Mark Sipe (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:01:27 -0500
published in I read same. Interesting how Howard takes offense at somebody else with a soapbox, but doesn't mind using one himself every now and then... He's taken a few pot shots at team.net, also.
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01508.html (8,875 bytes)

304. Re: Kudos to NAP and Mark Sipe (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 22:34:31 -0700
I recommend the one this thread relates to in particular. I read it when it first appeared and agreed with everything Mark said. I, for one, didn't object to his choice of words; it was extremely cle
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01537.html (8,339 bytes)

305. Re: Kudos to NAP and Mark Sipe (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 06:51:44 -0700
Depends on the specifics of the usage. Mark wasn't implying that in his article. There have been a couple of folks on team.net who've used the term in a pejorative sense, but I don't think many of us
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01554.html (9,361 bytes)

306. Re: how about a new Pro Solo class? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 09:31:53 -0500
fading memory... come to mind. pros... See what a'mean Vern? Jay "didn't take long, did it?" Mitchell
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01561.html (7,395 bytes)

307. Re: Kudos to NAP and Mark Sipe (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 10:13:51 -0500
Yep. I'm with you all the way on this one. to itself. For the same reasons that political activity is not allowed in the workplace for civil service employees, I feel strongly that it is inappropriat
/html/autox/1999-08/msg01569.html (8,977 bytes)

308. Re: Motorcycle FWD (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:04:38 -0500
Pet asked: a FWD Car Well, ahh, yes. Honda did that in 1968 or so. The car was called the Honda 600. Fine, as long as you didn't need to go any faster than a 600cc motorcycle engine could make a car
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00132.html (7,212 bytes)

309. WTB Hoosier Auto Crosser(s) 225/45 x 13 (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 08:39:47 -0500
Sorry for the spam, but I've got one tire close to cord with three good ones remaining. If I can find a decent used replacement for the worn one, I may get two or three additional events before I ha
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00159.html (6,661 bytes)

310. Re: Saturn timing chain - the real deal (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 20:32:49 -0700
Interesting. I've seen the insides of two VW engines that had been operated for more than 130k (one was at 163k). In both cases, I had changed the oil and filter every 7500 miles as specified by VW (
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00231.html (9,315 bytes)

311. Re: CSP tire/wheel questions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:54:24 -0500
Brad sez: the 13" will Unlikely, given your current speed capability in 2nd. Weight. I believe the current wisdom for CSP Hondas is 13 x 9 front, 13 x 8 rear, 225/50 or 225/45 tires all areound. Yes.
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00624.html (7,082 bytes)

312. Re: STU Rules Update Update (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:21:43 -0500
I've been trying to resist the urge to say something here, but I just had to give in. as we possibly The Stock classes already allow a VERY wide variety of cars the chance to play. The only POSSIBLE
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00659.html (11,689 bytes)

313. Re: STU Rules Update Update (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:21:22 -0500
<quoting me> or 7 marque Rules is rules. The ALLOWANCES you propose are like SPU, not STU. Taking full advantage of your allowances to optimize a car for Solo II will result in an unstreetable (for p
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00664.html (9,887 bytes)

314. Re: STU Rules Update Update (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:54:07 -0500
sense, I the reason the ricers thrown into a SP-type class. Regardless of what provisions are made or what classes are invented, people who show up with cars they modified with some other purpose tha
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00677.html (12,567 bytes)

315. Re: STU Rules Update Update (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:39:46 -0500
traditional intent Well, yes and no. If Street Touring is just a class for autox novices, then it really shouldn't become a Nationals class. ST was originally brought into existence to (sort of) fill
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00690.html (9,419 bytes)

316. Re: more STU stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 20:11:54 -0700
Yep. And even a base ST car optimized for Solo II competition will be a filling-remover. That's my point. You can't force Solo cars to be "streetable," you can only say what you can and can't modify.
/html/autox/1999-07/msg00716.html (7,587 bytes)

317. Re: TIRES FOR SALE!!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:42:11 -0700
I'm definitely interested, if the above are AutoCrossers. Please let me know the tire model, condition, etc. I may be interested in these, if they are the current radial in the autocross compound. Le
/html/autox/1999-07/msg01068.html (6,770 bytes)

318. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:45:06 -0500
<snip> ACR in I disagree. The popularity of the Neon in DS is due to large amounts of contingency money attracting the best drivers and the most intensive development efforts, which has a trickle-dow
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00407.html (9,539 bytes)

319. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:48:25 -0500
just a Look at the drivers who have won in this "dominant" car. Is it your position that those folks would NOT win in another car? have won _perception_??? Yep. Given the variations in conditions ove
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00421.html (10,070 bytes)

320. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:39:13 -0500
<snip> basis, You're assuming the CAR is responsible for this performance. If you take the best DRIVERS and put them in a mediocre car, they'll STILL win. picture? Because there's nothing wrong. Best
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00430.html (9,550 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu