Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 08:08:20 -0600
<quoting me> and I was pointing out the incredible discrepancy between the "stated intent" of the class and its extremely liberal prep allowances. Some (one, at least) of the promoters of SM drive th
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00123.html (9,250 bytes)

122. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 13:43:23 -0600
It's good to see you're including the quotes in the above. They're quite appropriate. SM more open than Prepared in many ways, but with interiors. Yep. And BOVs, and whatever. So far, the SM rules do
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00128.html (9,323 bytes)

123. Re: SM exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 17:57:51 -0600
Jeff Christianson the Wasdahl him) That is Oops. That's what happens when a model comes and goes in the blink of an eye, and you're not paying attention. I didn't remember that the TR8 motor was the
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00137.html (7,141 bytes)

124. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:16:49 -0600
It's not _required_ in SP. It is also not required in Stock. Requiring it in SM is silly. SM goes a lot further than SP in suspension, engine, and gearbox allowances. Why require that in SM, but not
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00138.html (8,556 bytes)

125. Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion List (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:43:17 -0600
posted the URL I'm going to add my observations to Matt's list in the hope that the aggregate will be of some use. Two seat cars. Rare, but I don't think they have any advantage over other period pon
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00226.html (11,006 bytes)

126. Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion List (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:26:29 -0600
of threat help if it were I did. The sedans above are large luxury cars in the German idiom. Somewhat more responsive than contemporary Mercedes sedans, but much heavier and larger than 2002s. You've
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00233.html (8,573 bytes)

127. Re: rev limiter? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:38:29 -0600
You might wanna get a clarification from the SEB on this, but my money says "no." A shift light would be legal because it's just a "gauge," but a rev limiter has to interface with the engine somewher
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00234.html (7,645 bytes)

128. Re: rev limiter? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:28:27 -0600
simply counter. That was my reading of the rules: since gauges and indicators are allowed, I couldn't find a philosophical basis for claiming that a shift indicator - whether it's a light or an audib
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00317.html (8,670 bytes)

129. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:19:17 -0600
<quoting Roger> Hahahaha. Yeah, SM should be very afraid of Pintos. Uhhh, lessee here, they're, ahh, rare. Yeah, that's it. Ford only made, what 3 or 4 million of them, right? And, uhh, oh yeah, they
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00452.html (10,136 bytes)

130. Re: The REAL Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:38:33 -0600
encouraging from my And we all hope you stay on your side. ;<) Jay "hope the fence has no holes" Mitchell
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00532.html (8,398 bytes)

131. Re: How many cylinders do you have? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:01:18 -0600
Here's my present total: Aerostar tow vehicle - 6 Windstar family hauler - 6 Europa autoxer - 4 Spare engines - 8 OS Max .35 C/L stunt engines - 3 Lifetime total - 84 (to the best of my recollection)
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00702.html (8,892 bytes)

132. Think it's bad here? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:32:57 -0600
Just got done looking at the SM list archives. If you guys think team.net has gotten stupid, you oughtta look at what's been going on over there. There's at least one guy who's threatening physical
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00801.html (6,696 bytes)

133. Re: prosolo (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:49:49 -0600
Well, OK. And, of course, you won't take this response personally, either. Right? unreliable. Uhh, Eric, I recall certain STOCK F-bodie cars having overheating issues in Pro Solo. So much so that the
/html/autox/2000-12/msg01030.html (9,346 bytes)

134. Re: prosolo (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:57:40 -0600
damaging the They overheated to the point of the coolant temp gauge going into the red. It was a particular generation (the current one or the one before that, IIRC) that had the problem. Never drove
/html/autox/2000-12/msg01035.html (9,180 bytes)

135. Re: Pre-'75 car choices (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 09:35:17 -0600
Jensen in England using >Volvo engines The Volvo B18 and B20 engines were both British designs. Which comes as no surprise to those of us who've owned cars with those engines. They are visually inter
/html/autox/2000-12/msg01099.html (9,343 bytes)

136. Seven year Rule (Was Re: Stock Classing) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 06:55:48 -0600
I doubt the wisdom of arguing something that is not gonna change anyway, but I believe the advocate(s) of the "only newer cars in Stock" concept miss some very important points. Proof of legality is
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00145.html (8,567 bytes)

137. Re: Old car classing (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:30:22 -0600
Somebody please point out to me the "problem" that exists with allowing older cars to run in Stock. I have seen no evidence whatever that such a problem exists. If it does, please enlighten us as to
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00172.html (7,338 bytes)

138. Re: Old car classing (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:38:52 -0600
that have been E.G., Bill Breedlove's Z car, some 914s, etc. I still have the question: how is this a problem, and how is the situation different than with newer cars? That's somebody's perception, t
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00175.html (8,412 bytes)

139. Re: How used is too used for AutoX? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:27:46 -0600
care of, decent autoX I know of one autocrosser who made it a practice to buy wrecks from which to build autox cars. He would have the frame checked and straightened - to the favorable edge of any fa
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00332.html (8,056 bytes)

140. Re: Traction in a can??? (was Re: Re Tire Warmers) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:34:23 -0500
I've only got half a can myself. That's why I'm only half fast. <FX: rimshot> Jay
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00114.html (7,199 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu