Mail Archive Search: <+from:golden1@britsys.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:golden1@britsys.net: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

141. re: vehicle ID proposal (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:14:23 -0400; Being a designer, I am aware of the problems this proposal is addressing, but I would NOT want to see it pass unless there was some allowance for approval of non-complying markings that meet the "spi; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00279.html (9,425 bytes)
142. Re: Topeka Pro Partial Results (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:49:23 -0400; Is it just me that finds it rather curiously disappointing that the results were not posted immediately on the event website when it was held right in SCCA's new backyard? /// unsubscribe/change addr; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00293.html (8,415 bytes)
143. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:01:07 -0400; Andy, I understand the frustration, I've expressed it myself, BUT, IMHO there still needs to be a "spirit of the rule" exemption available. I can say with certainty (I tested a number of single and m; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00306.html (13,096 bytes)
144. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:03:03 -0400; Exactly! All we need now is someone with the **'s to walk up to a fellow competitor who is clueless and say "come on take a walk with me ~ 100 yds away from your car, now let's look at it and tell me; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00313.html (8,798 bytes)
145. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:10:24 -0400; Can we compromise on adding wording that markings are not competitor protestable then? If we need this specific a rule for a few, then we need to prevent weenie protests of it from affecting finish o; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00331.html (12,942 bytes)
146. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:07:14 -0400; I found all the discussions about red on black not having contrast because... interesting, but there is a much easier way to verify enough contrast, size, legibility, location etc. Simply park your c; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00347.html (9,461 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 146
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]