Mail Archive Search: <+from:Mtnman3620@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Mtnman3620@aol.com: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

1. Re: I'm part of the 900! (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 07:51:33 EDT; Daniel Ledford Bardstown, KY GS, Mitsubishi Eclipse, Thurs/Fri Arriving Monday night/Early Tuesday morning, departing Saturday morning Amerisuites Looking forward to it!!!!!; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00008.html (8,034 bytes)
2. Re: Praying for rain (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 01:25:22 EDT; << Not to start anything here, but **I think** the Type R with front wheel drive can still be competitive against the all wheel drive DSM's in the rain......(emphasis added)>> See, there you go think; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00158.html (6,612 bytes)
3. Hmm... (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 01:29:54 EDT; << 6th year autocrossing, 6th Nationals, 6th car I'm driving at Nationals, 1st year to be National Champion.... >> Isn't that decided in about two weeks? ;^) Daniel Ledford 99 Mitsu Eclipse GSX; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00160.html (6,309 bytes)
4. Re: tires (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 11:01:24 EDT; << I'm back up to about 44 and 30, similar to what I ran in the G-forces. Does that sound right? I thought the pressure would be considerably less. >> Sounds close to me. I have found similar pressur; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00100.html (6,572 bytes)
5. Wendover Pro results? (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 21:06:44 EDT; Anyone heard? Just curious... Daniel "There's no way I'm heading all the way to Utah for a Pro" Ledford 99 Mitsu Eclipse GSX; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00346.html (6,418 bytes)
6. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 11:42:49 EDT; << An interesting point came up on the RX7 list - the use of pressurized CO2 to cool intercoolers on grid. Are people doing this at SCCA events now? Will there be people doing it in Topeka next month; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00796.html (7,835 bytes)
7. Type R Torque or lack thereof... (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:08:28 EDT; << 130 lbs/ft @ 7500 rpm. >> I know it's only 1.8L, but you'd think that Honda would have at least tried to improve this...MHO of course... Daniel Ledford 99 Mitsu Eclipse GSX; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01209.html (6,852 bytes)
8. Re: Type R Torque or lack thereof... (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:26:15 EDT; << Hey, that's 12 lb-ft more than my 1.8L Miata has :) >> ...But only 1 lb-ft more than my GS-R... =^) Daniel Ledford 99 Mitsu Eclipse GSX; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01211.html (6,825 bytes)
9. Re: Petition to amend SCCA bylaws (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:02:36 EDT; << A petition on a proposed amendment to the bylaws to stop all of SCCA's Pro Racing activities is now circulating. I urge all SCCA members to join me in supporting it. >> I can see where this would; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01273.html (7,712 bytes)
10. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:02:43 EDT; << Any word on whether the Type R is going to get kicked out? >> I would truly bet not. If they do, then look for the AWD cars getting the boot also. There is no sense in moving only one of them. MHO; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01351.html (7,474 bytes)
11. Fwd: Team T/A newsletter still published? (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:28:57 EDT; --part1_da0ebd11.24f7d079_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: Mtnman3620@aol.com From: Mtnman3620@aol.com Full-name: Mtnman3620 Message-ID: <8d39f48b.24f7cfe9@aol.com> Date: Fri, 27 Au; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01364.html (7,333 bytes)
12. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 20:48:58 EDT; Yes, D stock would be my choice. If you look at the times of the top Type-Rs and the Talons/Eclipses, they are just about equal to better than that of the neons. I believe it would be a good fight fo; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01406.html (7,396 bytes)
13. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 20:54:45 EDT; << What's wrong with moving them to B Stock? >> Two words--Performance Potential. The Type-R/Eclipses can in no way keep up with the Miatae. The Miatae are just to agile and too small to even be comp; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01407.html (7,751 bytes)
14. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:32:38 EDT; << Uh, for **US** in D Stock? No way you might underestimate the potential here, right Dan?>> Not at all... =^) <<Cars about the same weight>> Talk about underestimation...my car weights ~3200lbs...; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01413.html (8,814 bytes)
15. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? -Type R- not the DSM (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:36:13 EDT; << I thought this discussion was focused on the Type R, not the DSM clones >> Yes, but don't you know if the Type R goes who's going to be next? It's not going to be the wrathful F-body... ;^) ;^) ;^; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01415.html (6,851 bytes)
16. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:56:50 EDT; << I still think it makes sense to let it redefine G Stock with the Talons and Firebirds >> There was an earlier post about other cars that will be coming (possibly to G stock) out soon and with that; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01579.html (8,595 bytes)
17. Evansville NT Results (partial) (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 21:47:28 EDT; Howdy all, Here are some results from a heat-drained memory... SS: Pulliam, Lowe, Waters AS: Carter Thompson, Sipe, Beecher (good battle) BS: Matt Braun (by a bunch), Telehouski, Kumar CS: Priebe (se; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00116.html (6,783 bytes)
18. Re: Street Driving/AutoX (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:49:10 EDT; << If you can't get it to the ground, It doesn't matter >> Never was a truer word spoken... Daniel Ledford 99 Mitsu Eclipse GSX (AWD and lovin' it...); /html/autox/1999-07/msg00148.html (6,497 bytes)
19. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:55:59 EDT; << Not having to slow down as much has it's benefits and top-notch drivers like Priebe & Braun made maximum use of the advantage. >> So, why would an AS MR2 have to slow down more than a CS MR2? I un; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00150.html (7,122 bytes)
20. Re: Evansville Nat Tour Course (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 12:03:53 EDT; << If there was lots of going to the bottom of second gear and then up to the top of second gear than a powerful car would have had more advantage.>> For us in GS, this was the case, at least for me.; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00172.html (8,340 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]