Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jeff@WINCHELL.COM: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

221. Re: '99 Cobra Classing (score: 1)
Author: Jeff@Winchell.Com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 01:27:53 -0700
Track differences plus driver variability can make numbers like these irrelevant. You can put the ones from the 99 Mustang convertible on (all 99 convertibles have them not just Cobras) using the ba
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00135.html (7,344 bytes)

222. Re: '99 Cobra Classing (score: 1)
Author: Jeff@Winchell.Com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 01:35:07 -0700
It is in FS if stock. ESP if SP (on a separate line from previous Mustangs so no backdating/updating with other Mustangs). CP if you're goofy enough to gut the car for Prepared. I think it would mak
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00136.html (7,298 bytes)

223. Re: Subframes, again ... (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:42:56 +0100
The 99 Mustang convertibles have subframe connectors. Also some of the convertibles (at least my 98 Cobra) has a g load brace. I was really looking forward to getting SFC for my ESP 98 Cobra from th
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01116.html (7,322 bytes)

224. Re: best places to autox? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:49:51 +0100
My last autocross last year was late October and first this year was Mid-February, which was actually good to give time to make changes to cars (or to do other things besides autocross<s>). But even
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01165.html (8,657 bytes)

225. Re: How does a region foster nationally competitive drivers? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:39:48 +0100
Nothing is impossible .... except excelling at something you don't think you can. Jeff Winchell http://PonyCar.Net
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01570.html (9,768 bytes)

226. Re: Spins & Blame (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 03:37:24 -0800
How many times have you seen a car upside down at an autocross in those 13 years (and roughly how many cars haven't done that)? From what I've been able to gather, thousands of autocross entries have
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00002.html (8,195 bytes)

227. Re: Autocross Speed and Safety (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 03:57:12 -0800
<yawn>. In my 20+ years of driving, I see an accident on the roads every day. If people are afraid of 3 accidents in 13 years, they should cacoon themselves in a hermetically sealed box. Life is for
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00004.html (7,397 bytes)

228. Re: Spins & Blame (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 22:03:26 -0800
If you take the very low percentage of the flip multiplied by the very low percentage of it being at the wrong time and place, you have such low odds that it's not worth considering, IMO. Quite a fe
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00077.html (7,994 bytes)

229. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 02:27:13 -0800
ESP was won last year by a car that I'd estimate cost 30K. Doesn't seem like that's any cheaper than the RX-7 and Elan prices being quoted in this thread.
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00185.html (8,157 bytes)

230. Re: Spins & Blame (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 02:27:13 -0800
That's easy. Just don't have an autocross. I would think it's obvious that extremes are silly, but reading so many messages about people worrying that one roll over in 13 years (or similar statistic
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00186.html (8,186 bytes)

231. Re: Spins & Blame (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 11:47:59 -0800
Since perception by the site owner seems to be the relevant statistic, then miles is the wrong metric. Time is a better one. Is there more information on this, or was this the sole significant facto
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00213.html (8,795 bytes)

232. Re: Spins & Blame (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 14:39:11 -0800
I'm not dodging the issue. I'll repeat this again ...miles is the wrong unit of measure for this. What site was this? What is the sample size? Once again, I'm not dodging the issue. None of the even
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00219.html (10,059 bytes)

233. Re: Spins & Blame (statistics) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 13:06:55 -0700
Why spend effort researching the wrong metric? Yes, that's not a good metric, but that wasn't what I was asking for. I said miles is wrong, time is better. I didn't say the "per vehicle" part was wr
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00250.html (9,034 bytes)

234. Re: Spins & Blame (statistics) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 16:09:19 -0700
If there is no insurance claim and no site property is damaged, and no injury occurs, I guess I'm not sure why this has impact on site retention (assuming there is an otherwise good relationship bet
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00259.html (7,767 bytes)

235. Re: Spins & Blame (statistics) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 16:19:28 -0700
I believe this whole thing got started because people were worried about sites being cancelled (as well as the varying definitions of safety). Since the latter is subjective, I would like to focus o
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00261.html (8,651 bytes)

236. Re: McKamey: tire choice (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:02:33 -0700
Date sent: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:24:00 -0500 From: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com> Organization: i2 Technologies, Inc. To: richj50@bit-net.com Copies to: autox@autox.team.net, nersolo@ner.org Subject:
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00735.html (9,100 bytes)

237. Re: McKamey: tire choice (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:12:46 -0700
I did the school a few weeks ago, on a concrete surface (Mather Field in Sacramento). Because of anticipated tire wear, I got recommendations from some very good people to use my 275/40/17 Kumhos, o
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00736.html (7,972 bytes)

238. Re: SOLO 1 - Closed vs Open Cars (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 02:32:06 -0700
Same with open cars. Open cars require arm restraints. Closed can use arm restraints or a window net. Open cars require full face helmet or goggles, closed cars can have open face helmets. Those are
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01160.html (7,809 bytes)

239. Re: Why smaller wheels in Prepared? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:57:38 -0700
Where it isn't, it should be. In Canada, it is completely.
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01346.html (7,870 bytes)

240. RE: SOLO 1 - Closed vs Open Cars (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 10:00:40 -0700
How about lower seats? Jeff Winchell '98 Ford SVT Cobra Convertible
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01513.html (8,455 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu