Mail Archive Search: <+from:GSMnow@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:GSMnow@aol.com: 131 ]

Total 131 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:28:38 EDT; by << Perhaps this is a good time to ask: why not have Nationals on asphalt? >> It has been brought up, and I thought one course on each would have been cool. Use the south course as Paddock, and the; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01504.html (13,915 bytes)
82. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:28:39 EDT; <> << I wasn't there but the pictures I saw had tons of concrete debris near the course. That indicates to me that the surface on course must have had numerous irregularities. The kind that get me ne; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01505.html (10,556 bytes)
83. RE: ABS and Tire size (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:03:34 EDT; <<Someone is going to have to explain to me why a simple change in tire diameter could have any effect on an ABS car's ability to function. In the case where a larger tire were used, the system shoul; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01934.html (9,039 bytes)
84. Re: boat-o-cross (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 14:18:45 EDT; << I thought about the same thing with the Firestone boat. hhhmmmm??? I wonder. >> He has some old Firestone tires on his dock so he doesn't beat up the side of the boat. ;-) Gary M.; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00006.html (6,933 bytes)
85. Re: Help Quick! G-force mounting question (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 11:24:16 EDT; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:36:50 -0400 From: Gent Matthew-EMG030 << I picked up a used set of G-forces and I'm having them mounted up this morning. Are these tires symmetrical in all directions? On a; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00526.html (7,885 bytes)
86. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:45:59 EDT; trophies fault........ :-) Jay responded: <The flawed logic here is that a trophy in one class is or should <be precisely equivalent to a trophy in some other class. That'll <never happen. There will; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01195.html (10,879 bytes)
87. Re: Spokes: Re: Big Swaybar Woes... (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:37:54 EDT; To keep this short I did not copy anything. The "problem" is the sway bar brackets breaking on the frame. Well, the way the rule reads in the book, you can use ANY means to attach a new sway bar to t; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01327.html (8,851 bytes)
88. Re: Spokes: Re: Big Swaybar Woes... (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 01:57:16 EDT; << Want to bet. You'll be tossed so fast your head will spin for days. You are adding a structural support; that's a no-no. >> I am not talking about a huge brace across the car or even diagonally o; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01362.html (11,252 bytes)
89. RE: Reduced class structure: now CSP/DSP Civic question (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:02:07 EDT; << Whoa.. You can do motor swaps in SP? I'm pretty new to Solo2 and I'm currently running a stock Civic, but I had no idea you could do a motor swap in SP. It seems pretty counter-intuitive actually.; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01567.html (9,094 bytes)
90. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:20:20 EDT; <<This is long, and I'm looking for feedback. But PLEASE, if you respond to the list, DO NOT quote this thing in it's entirety! Do the list a favour, and snip out the little bits you intend to discus; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00055.html (9,485 bytes)
91. Re: WTB: Prelude ATTS (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:20:18 EDT; <<Help Honda's ATTS (Active Torque Transfer System) is supposed to direct power to the OUTSIDE front wheel in turns. This is supposed to help the car turn. Sounds good to me but no salesperson could; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00056.html (8,613 bytes)
92. Re: SST vs STU (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:41:18 EDT; Since I just got back from Evansville, and we actually had ST STR andSTU cars running, I can make a few comments. The times the ST and STR cars were turning were very close, and I think the top ST ca; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00125.html (8,397 bytes)
93. Re: Suspension setup question (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:53:12 EDT; << I have a car with four wheel independent suspension. It tracks straight down the road, but turns noticeably better to the left than to the right. Where do I look? >> There are many thins that coul; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00149.html (7,299 bytes)
94. Re: Evansville Nat Tour courses (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 02:39:55 EDT; << I sorta agree with Mark. However, the ability to not only go fast, but also << *maintain* that speed in FS and "high power" classes was also definitely a << factor in who won (at least with FS, an; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00248.html (9,369 bytes)
95. Re: Brake Pads (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:26:16 EDT; << I am in desparate need of new rear brake pads for my Integra GS-R... I have Axxis Metal Masters on the front, which I am not unhappy with, but I have heard a lot about Carbotech! I don't want to r; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00354.html (8,564 bytes)
96. Re: DTN, Lucretia MacEvil (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 01:24:06 EDT; <<Phil Ethier wrote/pasted: <<">Phil- You wrote: And remember, a vote for JD, is a <<vote for Lucretia McEvil. This Phil agrees." that if LUCRETIA gets elected, I don't THINK she'd leave without me..; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00451.html (7,830 bytes)
97. Re: STU/SST - Some Interesting Observations (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:05:50 EDT; <This past weekend was the 1999 Diamond Star Shootout. a two-day orgy of <drag racing, autocross, and car-shows dedicated to the Diamond Star cars <y'all love to hate. < <This was like the 7th or 8th; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00503.html (8,429 bytes)
98. Re: STU/SST - Some Interesting Observations (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:45:25 EDT; even swings << I don't think that this is always the case Gary. I was a new comer this past weekend as you know, and I did not feel out classed at all. i was more nervous than anything of making an a; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00548.html (10,052 bytes)
99. Re: DTN voting (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:32:24 EDT; << just a few more hours to go! come on folks, get those votes in! Lets see some serious last minute campaigning!! >> Okay, here it goes, Just to let the rest of the list know a bit about me (Gary Me; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00667.html (8,872 bytes)
100. Re: STU Displacement Limit - Another Idea (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:32:27 EDT; << It had been brought to my attention that there is a special reason why the ST displacement limit was raised from 2.4 L in its original form to the 3.1L in its current form. There exists a GM 3.1L; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00668.html (13,598 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]