Mail Archive Search: <+from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com: 249 ]

Total 249 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Sequential Stock Classes (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:10:42 -0700; All it would take would be the 'inventors' of this idea to sit down for 10 minutes and really try to figure out how to do it. It would take soooo long. You would have to evaluate EVERY car on the mar; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00310.html (7,793 bytes)
62. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:19:46 -0700; You had better have some facts to back up statements like this. If this is just pure conjecture on your part, I would keep "ideas" like that to myself. If you have never seen Mark run, you don't real; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00315.html (9,476 bytes)
63. Re: Stock class reclassings - now Daddio car (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:20:02 -0700; You had better have some facts to back up statements like this. If this is just pure conjecture on your part, I would keep "ideas" like that to myself. If you have never seen Mark run, you don't real; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00321.html (7,540 bytes)
64. Trailer Queens (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:54:44 -0700; Oh, that RX-7 that came in second last year in Topeka...I drove it to the event (back is another issue altogether... : ) Understand that when you see cars pull into a NT, Pro Solo or Nationals; the t; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00330.html (7,699 bytes)
65. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:07:02 -0700; What you DID say was that you woudn't be suprised if his car "was as alien as he is". What did you mean by this, that his car was bone stock? Don't infer anything unless you can back it up. AB Mike L; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00340.html (12,321 bytes)
66. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:57:07 -0700; Ran a C5 coupe this weekend on two consecutive runs after three consecutive runs in my RX-7. Long course. 65.0 in the RX-7 and 65.8 in the C5 - and I have driven C5's exactly that many times ever, tw; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00465.html (10,489 bytes)
67. Was Stock Class: now Celica ST (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 05:19:44 -0700; Gary types: While I can understand SOME of your points, you have to go back to that time to understand the cars and the classings. What you have in class 8 is the *OLD* GS. The same GS that was withi; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00598.html (7,375 bytes)
68. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:44:41 -0700; But the point remains: a whole class worth of difference? I don't think so. The ES car on the other hand may need revisiting. For what its worth, I have seen MAYBE one letter with action requested on; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00844.html (8,805 bytes)
69. Re: More Fiero (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:48:49 -0700; The committees NEVER heed a request just because someone writes in. If the request is founded and has a corresponding benefit to the club, it doesn't matter how many people write in, 1 or 1000. I wou; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00887.html (9,363 bytes)
70. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:42:01 -0700; OK, let's also stop comparing the Miata 1.6 --> 1.8 situation to the Fiero 1985 through 1987 --> 1988. The Miata 1.6 was not moved because there was a large contingent of people asking for it. It was; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00889.html (9,852 bytes)
71. re: Miata 1.6 move (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:01:45 -0700; Well I guess we disagree! I am telling you the reason it moved, peroid. If you don't think it was the right thing to do, that is fine as well but that was the reason; to add another popular, inexpens; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00934.html (10,263 bytes)
72. Re: More Fiero - CS and Miata 1.6l (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:08:24 -0700; <deep breath> Let's take your BMW example. Many people have stated that there isn't a class worth of difference between the 1.6l Miata and the 1.8 or Sport version in 1999. If that is the case then y; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00935.html (9,797 bytes)
73. Re: Fw: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:01:00 -0700; You know what? I think this view is great...but not possible. We HAVE two classes that older cars are at the top...CS and what will be the 'new GS' of Class 8. Just because the Fiero isn't the cream; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00974.html (10,539 bytes)
74. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:07:07 -0700; Like I had said before: If one letter comes through with valid points and a benefit to the club, then one letter is all that is needed to get the powers that be to start a new thought process. If it; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00976.html (11,748 bytes)
75. Re: Fair Classing for everybody is ridiculous? (was Fiero (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:20:03 -0700; OK, I am learning my lesson Roger, don't get involved...: ) I am making statements as a realist. If you want me to blow smoke up your butt, I can do that too, bit it isn't my style. For you to ask fo; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01013.html (15,487 bytes)
76. 1000 in 2000 - typo (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:41:39 -0700; What I should have written was "1000 classes in 2000". THAT is how we class every car fairly!!!! Sheesh. AB Thanks Matt...; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01015.html (6,403 bytes)
77. Fair Classing - Final Thoughts (hopefully) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 07:08:44 -0700; Let's just say this: if you don't send in your idea, assuming you can make it work, then you have wasted your time. I would love to read it and see if it passes muster. We are open to all new ideas b; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01031.html (9,928 bytes)
78. Was Equitable/Fiero etc - Now Look (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 06:06:11 -0700; The list of cars that was published to the website as part of the minutes has a few issues: A lot of cars were omitted Some cars were mis-classed by mistake Some where transcribed wrong Look for a cl; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01165.html (8,702 bytes)
79. Wendover SS Results - Vette! (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:05:17 -0700; Congrats to Stacy M for what looks like fast time on one side by .001 over Tom K. Erik took the overall win but the times were all within one and a half tenths. Looks like the C5 can run with the RX-; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01207.html (7,614 bytes)
80. RE: Wendover SS Results - Vette! (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:58:05 -0700; Come on, lets give some credit here OK? So what if it was a drag strip? My RX-7 runs 13.4's at 105 in SS trim on street tires. Yes the Vette faster in a straight line but there had to be SOME corners; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01223.html (8,243 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]