- 21. Re: why I trailer my Stock Class car (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:36:52 EDT
- Reason #6 for Alex's list So I can tow someone else's broke stock car home. I have towed cars I didn't own back from 3 of the 9 Pro events attended; Peru and Harrisburg last year, and Fort Myers this
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00514.html (6,953 bytes)
- 22. Re: Alcohol Events (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:24:48 EDT
- I still have the guidance that Denver provided me when I tried to pull this off at Keesler. The requirements and format are pretty specific as in dual vehicle controls, and courses that don't tun bac
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01374.html (7,360 bytes)
- 23. AWD advantage and a touch of ESP (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 21:36:36 EDT
- Actually, my reply was more concerned with the bigger picture, I didn't, nor do I now, see your concern as whining. I sure was one of the loudest screamers when the Type-R's were first classed in GS
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00027.html (8,939 bytes)
- 24. Re: From the Idle Speculation Dept (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:53:31 EDT
- I really don't know if anything designed for wire wheels will hold up to what DG is thinking about!! <grin> Dennis, I think you are looking for Halibrand. According to Puhn's book, (possibly dated) A
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00039.html (7,000 bytes)
- 25. Re: Visas to Russia (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:58:18 EDT
- The search for Russian AutoX is on.. We have a man on the inside.. And Katie, the reason it takes so long, is part of your package is you get to be followed at a distance the whole time!! these thing
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00040.html (7,953 bytes)
- 26. Re: nother Wild idea (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:09:47 EDT
- I believe that a rotary powered formula car falls under the GCR class of ASR, which also is BM Alan
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00541.html (6,499 bytes)
- 27. Re: Harnesses legal in Stock Class? (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:42:54 EDT
- Yes they are legal, but you can't modify the seat to make them work.. In other words, you can't cut the seat to pass submarine belts through alan
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00584.html (6,751 bytes)
- 28. Re: Calling all technical gurus! (non-autox content follows) (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:24:29 EDT
- I have seen "Bubble Yum" bubble gum used to fix a metal tank at a Pro Rally... The car finished the event, but I don't know how much longer it would go. Alan
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg00720.html (7,654 bytes)
- 29. Re: Nationals prerequisite event (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:02:56 EDT
- The way I understand it, you must enter a Tour or Divisional... According to my entry form Pro's don't count. Hopefully, I'm wrong.. Alan
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01366.html (7,502 bytes)
- 30. Big Chunks of Pavement (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:49:52 EDT
- While I like the idea of a dedicated AutoX facility... it ain't quite as easy as finding a piece of paradise and put up a parking lot. In this day and age it is very difficult for private or commerci
- /html/autox/2000-06/msg01867.html (6,820 bytes)
- 31. Re: Driver Classing (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 19:24:49 EDT
- Damn DG, you got too much time on your hands!!!!! <GRIN> As for all the griping about how certain cars simply dominate their respective classes, another very important point to remember is the time,
- /html/autox/2000-05/msg00860.html (7,511 bytes)
- 32. Re: Y2K Tires (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:28:33 EST
- Heard some rumors, but no one's called here..
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg00433.html (7,131 bytes)
- 33. JAX Evolution/McKamey School (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 12:11:57 EST
- Still wondering what to get that special Autoxr in your life? Buccaneer Region SCCA will be hosting an Evolution(former McKamey) Autocross School January 22nd and 23rd at Whitehouse Airfield. We will
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg00587.html (6,885 bytes)
- 34. JAX Evolution/McKamey School (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:58:45 EST
- --part1_0.1265eec6.25901cb5_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: Ajstratton@aol.com From: Ajstratton@aol.com Full-name: Ajstratton Message-ID: <0.50bb2e96.2585315d@aol.com> Date: Sun, 1
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg00875.html (7,347 bytes)
- 35. Re: Street mod question (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 23:06:46 EST
- Without seeing the specific wording of the new SM class, based on last year's STU, a car would have to first be eligible for ST. One of the basic tenets of ST was that cars were sedans/coupes, not sp
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg01041.html (7,176 bytes)
- 36. Re: What happened to Stock Class? (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 22:24:22 EST
- The Eclipse GS-T / GSX was positioned in BS in 1996, the first year I campaigned it. At that time it ran against other turbo(mostly RWD) cars. 944 turbo's and SHO's come to mind, at that time GS bump
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00421.html (8,391 bytes)
- 37. Fwd: Co-Driver Arrangements (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:14:10 EST
- --part1_0.a78a4a40.256217f2_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: Ajstratton@aol.com From: Ajstratton@aol.com Full-name: Ajstratton Message-ID: <0.99fcf86d.2561f84d@aol.com> Date: Mon, 1
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00728.html (8,899 bytes)
- 38. Re: Y2K local schedules? (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 22:08:59 EST
- Hold on there!! Some folks haven't finished '99 yet!! Alan
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00892.html (6,384 bytes)
- 39. Re: SWAY BARS???? (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:24:16 EDT
- This may have already been suggested but it's another thought, How about ALL stock class cars run STOCK swaybars. Pretty simple, no cost, no fairness issue either? But does it really matter, all aspe
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00649.html (8,381 bytes)
- 40. Re: Sway Bars??? (score: 1)
- Author: Ajstratton@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:32:01 EDT
- It would seem to me, that by allowing positioning of swaybars based on weight distribution would in effect be no change for most stock cars. particularly frontdrivers.. alan
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00650.html (6,724 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu