Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+400each\s+2\.6\s+V6s\s+on\s+Ebay\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+400each\s+2\.6\s+V6s\s+on\s+Ebay\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Re: 400each 2.6 V6s on Ebay] (score: 1): Author: Jan Eyerman <jan.eyerman@usa.net>; Date: 8 Aug 2001 20:48:46 EDT; Rootes HP was actually quite conservative. I believe that the 1968 Rapier was quoted as 95 HP and was 88 DIN HP. The Early Minxes were quoted as 53 HP and were 47 or 48 DIN. Nothing like some US cars; /html/alpines/2001-08/msg00116.html (13,321 bytes)
2. Re: [Re: 400each 2.6 V6s on Ebay] (score: 1): Author: Victor Hughes <hughes@scides.canberra.edu.au>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 14:39:18 +1000; Which would make the 90 bhp DIN for these V6s about 97 'Rootes' bhp Vic S3 ST with 82 'Rootes' bhp (about 76 bhp DIN) + whatever extractors, downdraft Weber and slightly higher compression gives; /html/alpines/2001-08/msg00119.html (14,594 bytes)
3. Re: [Re: 400each 2.6 V6s on Ebay] (score: 1): Author: "Louis & Laila" <bwana@c2i2.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 05:02:29 -0700; HP is HP, but I am sure it is the difference in torque that the conversion people are after. -- Original Message -- downdraft Rapier was HP and 200+ and understand is bhp (or bhp. realm, more existed; /html/alpines/2001-08/msg00126.html (15,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]