Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*unrelated\.\.\.motorcycles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*unrelated\.\.\.motorcycles\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 20:25:26 -0500; Does anyone on the list have a Kawasaki KLR650? If so...what do you think of yours? I am considering buying a new one. street-trail riding? Any comments would be greatly appreciated. I know...I know,; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00143.html (7,773 bytes)
2. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: "R. Ashford Little II" <ralittle2@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:41:59 -0500; Get a Triumph bike. Btw, saw the movie "How to lose a guy in 10 days" last night, and Matthew McConaughey rides a, you guessed it, a Triumph. Bike not car. R. Ashford Little II www.geocities.com/rali; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00147.html (8,365 bytes)
3. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:57:24 -0500; The new Triumph Bonneville would be my first choice for a street only motorcycle! Powerful and light...as a motorcycle should be! I like to trail ride as well! As far as I know Triumph has not impor; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00148.html (7,853 bytes)
4. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: Brian Finck <brian.finck@powerhouse.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:14:52 -0500; Hey Jim, I don't know about the new Bonnie, it looks sort of like the original, but is gutless, only about 60Hp. All my old Norton's make as nearly much, or more, in the case of the Combat Commando,; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00151.html (8,719 bytes)
5. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Hanselman" <tr6@kc4sw.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:11:53 -0800; 60 Hp is still enough to get into real trouble with. It's on a light frame with good gearing and will probably get real close to 90MPH in the standing quarter mile Steve --Original Message-- From: ow; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00167.html (9,273 bytes)
6. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: Walt Philipson <WaltP@Anspach.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:19:10 -0500; Someone's complaining about a 60 hp motorcycle when our cars produce 100, 150 at best? Jeez! :) 60 Hp is still enough to get into real trouble with. It's on a light frame with good gearing and will p; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00168.html (9,621 bytes)
7. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: Brian Finck <brian.finck@powerhouse.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:44:01 -0500; 60 Hp will get you in trouble with the law, but you don't get into anything resembling "real trouble" until you pass 100Hp. That new Bonnie isn't really a light frame, by today's standards, I think i; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00169.html (9,944 bytes)
8. RE: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: Brian Finck <brian.finck@powerhouse.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:56:18 -0500; Hi Walt, I know it sounds at little off base to complain about 60HP in a 500lb machine, compared to 100HP in a 2500lb machine, but cutting edge bikes these days can run up to around 175Hp in a machin; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00170.html (10,432 bytes)
9. Re: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: StangGuy67@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:50:19 EST; << 60 Hp will get you in trouble with the law, but you don't get into anything resembling "real trouble" until you pass 100Hp. That new Bonnie isn't really a light frame, by today's standards, I thin; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00177.html (7,768 bytes)
10. Re: unrelated...motorcycles (score: 1): Author: David Friedlander <forzion@maine.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 21:53:59 -0500; Maybe you guys should start a Triumph bike list! :- ) Dave; /html/6pack/2003-02/msg00183.html (7,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]