Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*exhaust\s+recommendations\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*exhaust\s+recommendations\?\?\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:20:48 -0800 (PST); Mike, and others--A while back I commented that some of the modern mufflers use the noise canceling effect, rather than baffles, to suppress noise. I stopped by the muffler shop to ask them the brand; /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00034.html (7,411 bytes)
2. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: Mitchel Seff <ms6453@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 20:28:35 -0500; Hi all-The open baffle design seems to produce an exceptable exhaust tone under normal driving. I had experimented with dynaflow (a Walker product) & Flowmaster with good around town results but on h; /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00036.html (7,315 bytes)
3. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: Rick Patton <rpatton@clinic.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 21:17:30 -0500; Dick, you mentioned a couple of Magnaflow muffler numbers. I just looked at the web site and only wish my car wasn't in storage so I could take some measurements. Can you tell me about your system? A; /html/6pack/2001-12/msg00038.html (8,851 bytes)
4. exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "Matt M." <afterburn27@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:27:45 -0800 (PST); Which exhaust system do you think is the best in terms of performance, looks, and sound. I think performance is the top item on my list, then sound and looks follow pretty close after. I think the TR; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00224.html (8,017 bytes)
5. RE: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "Creamer, Mark" <CreamerM@cintas.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:52:41 -0500; Hi Matt, On the production date issue, I've read that the 74 1/2 designation ran from Commission Number CF27001U through CF35000U. Sometimes there is debate on this type of thing, but it's probably a; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00225.html (8,524 bytes)
6. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: rcotting@mgnet.ca; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:01:33 -0400; Matt - you will probably receive feedback that the Falcon stainless system will meet all your needs. I certainly endorse mine. The most obvious sign of a 74 1/2 is the rubber bumperettes added part w; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00226.html (7,550 bytes)
7. RE: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "Avey, Roy S." <RAVEY@logicon.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:15:38 -0800; Actually, all 74s had the rubber bumper things - the early 74 just added them to the 73 bumper and the 74 1/2 moved the bumper up and put the turn signal lights below the bumper (like the 75 and 76); /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00227.html (8,094 bytes)
8. RE: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "John Korsak" <jkorsak@heath-bloxom.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:34:10 -0600; As a fairly new owner of a 74 TR6 (June 2001)I known of your excitement. I would start by ordering parts catalogs from the major suppliers: Victoria British WWW.victoriabritish.com TRF www.the-roadst; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00228.html (9,189 bytes)
9. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:19:35 -0500 (EST); Okay. Bzzzzt. You are mis-informed. Please play again. All '74's starting with CF12500 have bumper overriders a.k.a. "boobs". The 74.5 model bumper height was raised to meet collision standards. rml; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00229.html (8,243 bytes)
10. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:43:55 -0500 (EST); First note that performance with respect to Triumph 6 cylinder motors means LOUD. But, not all loud systems give better performance. If you want performance, then a good header (with "proper" primary; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00230.html (11,833 bytes)
11. RE: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:10:37 -0600; John> excitement. I would start by ordering parts catalogs from the John> major suppliers: John> Victoria British WWW.victoriabritish.com John> TRF www.the-roadster-factory.com John> Moss Motors www; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00231.html (8,581 bytes)
12. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:34:32 -0800 (PST); Robert, Matt, and interested parties--It is written that it is no longer necessary to have 'loud' mufflers to get better performance. New technology uses the 'noise canceling' effect to help silence; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00237.html (7,806 bytes)
13. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: "James Franks" <jimmble@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:16:25 -0500; I had a TR6 with an ANSA exhaust on it once, and it was fantastic for fit and sound. I haven't seen them for years, though. I personally find the Monza to be too raspy, with an irritating droning res; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00313.html (8,038 bytes)
14. Re: exhaust recommendations??? (score: 1): Author: Tom Morgan <morgant@ctc.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:35:22 -0800; I recently installed the dual stainless system that Moss sells. Sounds great, the right mix of aggressive without being loud just to be loud. Very well made but really changed the look of the back en; /html/6pack/2001-11/msg00314.html (7,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]