Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+Timing\s+Specs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+Timing\s+Specs\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. TR6 Timing Specs (score: 1): Author: William Elliott <wcelliot@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:32:15 -0500; Sorry for the stupid question, but a new TR6 owner asked me and I realized I didn't have an answer... In virtually every other car on the road, static and dynamic timing specs are the same (or at lea; /html/6pack/2000-09/msg00048.html (7,064 bytes)
2. Re: TR6 Timing Specs (score: 1): Author: Jim Davis <jh_davis@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 04:33:37 -0400; It's because the '71 and newer TR6s have a vacuum retard and mechanical advance. The retard operates at high vacuum, at idle and deceleration. Jim Davis Fortson, GA CF38690UO CF37325U; /html/6pack/2000-09/msg00052.html (7,537 bytes)
3. Re: TR6 Timing Specs (score: 1): Author: William Elliott <wcelliot@concentric.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 06:02:51 -0500; But the workshop manual says to disconnect the retard when setting timing, so that should take it out of the picture in the static vs. dynamic setting. Or am I missing something here? Bill Elliott; /html/6pack/2000-09/msg00053.html (7,942 bytes)
4. Re: TR6 Timing Specs (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Beaudoin <jbdoin@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:29:37 -0400; This is a big mistake in Bentley... the best way to see if everything is working fine is to get the static timing at 12 Before and run the engine at 800 - 850 RPM after... if everything is running fi; /html/6pack/2000-09/msg00055.html (7,231 bytes)
5. Re: TR6 Timing Specs (score: 1): Author: Jim Davis <jh_davis@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 18:58:59 -0400; I have copied the following from a web article by Tomislav Marincic at the following link: http://www.mit.edu/people/zimerman/Documents/tr6/advretard.html He is referring to an early model in this e; /html/6pack/2000-09/msg00058.html (9,967 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]