Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\.75\s+wheel\s+cylinders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\.75\s+wheel\s+cylinders\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: rcotting@mgnet.ca; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:56:22 -0300; I'm quite interested in any comments regarding brakes because, in the last year, I have replaced front discs & pads, all brake lines, rear cylinders, and rebuilt the master cylinder. My brakes certai; /html/6pack/2001-06/msg00000.html (6,154 bytes)
2. RE: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: Btp44@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:31:46 EDT; Does anybody know why the wheel cyl. dia. changed in 1976? Was it a matter of using whatever parts were available or was it made to correct a problem with the rear brakes? Any detectable advantage to; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00265.html (6,987 bytes)
3. Re: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Riedel" <nriedel@nextek.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:14:58 -0400; of with Berry, As I understand it, the added weight due to the strengthened rear bumper required one to give the brake pedal a mid push to lock up the rear brakes rather than just a tap on the pedal; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00266.html (7,859 bytes)
4. RE: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: Jim Hill <Jim_Hill@chsra.wisc.edu>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:02:56 -0500; And Nelson Riedel replied: Now I'm lost - why would anyone want the rear brakes to lock up with "just a tap on the pedal"? Unique autocross circumstances aside, why would anyone want the rear brakes; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00267.html (7,719 bytes)
5. RE: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Darrell Ramsey" <triumphfan71@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 18:35:28 -0000; Not to worry, I think Nelson's tongue was firmly planted in his cheek as he pointed out this british engineering "feature". Darrell _________________________________________________________________; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00268.html (8,479 bytes)
6. Re: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Riedel" <nriedel@nextek.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:40:00 -0400; a first Jim, My earlier comments were a bit exaggerated in jest. You gave a good explanation of why one probably doesn't want to use .75 cylinders on earlier cars. Nelson; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00269.html (7,599 bytes)
7. Re: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Riedel" <nriedel@nextek.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:00:32 -0400; a first Jim, My earlier comments were a bit exaggerated in jest. I've found its pretty easy to lock up the rear brakes on the TR250/TR6 -- about like a pre ABS pickup. I slammed on my brakes last wee; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00270.html (8,244 bytes)
8. Re: .75 wheel cylinders (score: 1): Author: Btp44@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:59:31 EDT; Did Triumph ever issue a service bulletin concerning the change in wheel cyl. Berry; /html/6pack/2001-05/msg00271.html (6,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]