Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+emissions\s+controls\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+emissions\s+controls\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Emissions controls (score: 1): Author: <johnehorton@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT); Has anyone had experience with removing emissions controls I.E. carbon canister and lines from the TR8 1976. Should I just remove it and plug the lines? John Horton 1976 TR6 -- Choose the right car b; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00023.html (6,664 bytes)
2. [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: <johnehorton@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:44:43 -0700 (PDT); Does anyone know if removing the emissions I.E. carbon canister cause aby problems? I intend to plug the openings. John 1976 TR6 -- Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00055.html (6,746 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: Hugh Barber <tr6nut@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:30:34 -0400; Don't know why you would want to yank the canister. It has little to no effect on power or driveability (if its working correctly). If you must remove it, you'll need to figure out a way to vent the; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00057.html (6,955 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: "John North" <johncnorth@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:54:59 -0400; Well, you'd be contributing to problems with our planet for a start!; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00058.html (6,717 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: "Marty Clark" <marty.tr6@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:11:52 -0700; I ended up unplugging mine so the TR6 could pass the hydrocarbon idle test for emmissions. Passed the other 3 tests before unplugging. Marty Clark Gilbert, AZ 1974 TR6 CF17352U http://www.triumphown; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00059.html (7,288 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:31:20 -0400 (EDT); I guess that depends on what you call problems. Seriously, unless the canister is clogged or otherwise "bad", you should leave it in. If you take the evap. system out of the car, your garage will sme; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00061.html (8,263 bytes)
7. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:35:19 -0700; Marty--I think the AZ emissions testing proceedure is similar to what we have in CA. Most of the emissions "piping" for this is a visual for the testing facility, against a check list for that partic; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00062.html (7,556 bytes)
8. Re: [6pack] emissions controls (score: 1): Author: <johnehorton@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:55:21 -0700 (PDT); I want to have more access to the engine compartment. I worked for seven years in Arizona to get the law changed and was able to do so. I also plan to change carbs to SU or port injection. This would; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00063.html (7,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]